Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jchandra

jchandra

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 10:14 AM UTC
HN karma
117
Public activity
31 items

About jchandra

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jchandra; my proof: https://keybase.io/jchandra/sigs/CZWAMEfii33T_DFtePEne5Zksf74ElLdHSgYnh7FOxw ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47851811

    Yeah, that’s consistent. topK keeps the obvious tokens, but subtle context gets eroded over time rather than dropped all at once.

  2. comment
    Comment #47851789

    Fair point, the gap isn’t huge in that plot, and both degrade at low ratios. The difference is more in how they degrade: TopK can have sharper, localized failures, while HAE tends …

  3. comment
    Comment #47851656

    Thanks, really appreciate the pointer. Will dig into it.

  4. comment
    Comment #47850823

    Haha, that’s a very fair reading :) Yeah, the latency hit is definitely real. That said, most of what I’ve run so far is CPU-bound, which likely exaggerates it quite a bit so I did…

  5. comment
    Comment #47850776

    I completely agree.Right now this is all on a synthetic setup to isolate the behavior and understand the reconstruction vs memory tradeoff. Real models will definitely behave diffe…

  6. comment
    Comment #47850603

    That’s a great point and yeah, I’d agree SVD itself isn’t new at all. On downsides: definitely a few. The biggest one is latency - SVD is fairly heavy, so even though it’s amortize…

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #47823676

    In this prototype, OLS + SVD isn’t per-token, it runs only when the recycle bin fills (amortized over multiple tokens). That said, it’s still heavier than Top-K. I haven’t benchmar…

  9. comment
    Comment #47823556

    I’ve been exploring KV cache optimization for LLM inference. Most methods (Top-K, sliding window) prune tokens. This works on average, but fails selectively — a few tokens cause la…

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #43886876

    Totally fair point — at the end of the day, it's all about getting the best model performance. I was mostly trying to highlight how, under the hood, a lot of modern HPO algos reall…

  12. story
  13. comment
    Comment #43436973

    Pickle still is good for custom objects (JSON loses methods and also order), Graphs & circular refs (JSON breaks), Functions & lambdas (Essential for ML & distributed systems) and …

  14. story
  15. comment
    Comment #43373871

    pytorch save/load still are pickle based models. Its fine for trusted sources but when you start using from untrusted sources then there is always a risk of ACE. If you want to exe…

  16. comment
    Comment #43373777

    joblib is not fully secure because it still relies on Pickle internally. The reason it is slightly better in pickle is due to fact that pickle file gets immediately executed when i…

  17. story
  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #43317158

    our approach wasn’t about over-engineering, we were trying to leverage our existing investments (like Confluent BYOC) while optimizing for flexibility, cost, and performance. We wa…

  20. comment
    Comment #43312396

    We did have a discussion on Self vs Managed and TCOs associated with it. 1> We have multi regional setup so it came up with Data Sovereignty requirements. 2> Vendor Lock ins - Few …

  21. comment
    Comment #43312290

    As for BigQuery, while it's a great tool, we faced challenges with high-volume, small queries where costs became unpredictable as it is priced per data volume scanned. Clustered ta…

  22. story
  23. comment
  24. story
  25. story