Viewing profile — jbclements
jbclements
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 06, 2013, 2:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 381
- Public activity
- 59 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jbclements
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40166044
I think this is a fair question. In my opinion, if you're developing a larger application then nearly all of your code will either be in the "racket" language. If you're keen on ty…
-
comment
Comment #39559262
Interesting, looks like Ben Greenman started work on a port to Racket, but it does appear that that work is still firmly WIP: https://github.com/bennn/mechanics
-
comment
Comment #39004435
I think it's probably more productive to think of this in economic terms; "nonchalance toward optimization" "I can write this code in an hour instead of three hours". And, from a c…
-
comment
Comment #31237906
I think the poster is referring to racket-lang.org, which is served through cloudflare. But wait! I have a solution. If you want the web site content locally, the whole thing is bu…
-
comment
Comment #20046047
Lots of good clean fun in this article. My one question: would continuation marks avoid all of the `set!` messiness?
-
comment
Comment #19372821
No, it's clear that the researchers are using the term trapdoor in a technical sense. Specifically, one of the key ideas in the swiss system is that it produce a proof that the vot…
-
comment
Comment #17169812
another reason to dislike Python, sigh.
-
comment
Comment #16068290
Sounds like you have a good source of information; any chance you can share pointers? Thanks! Apologies if I missed this in upstream posts.
-
comment
Comment #15772817
Okay, this is going to sound mean, but this is like the definition of p-hacking. When you look at 30 values, you simply can't be surprised that one of them is lower than the mean, …
-
comment
Comment #15396646
No, I think that the socratic method can be much more intensely infuriating because it's clear that the teacher is withholding the answer from you. (FWIW, I use the socratic method…
-
comment
Comment #15396547
(Mostly just hoisting Noel Welsh's comment to the top level) How will the expected upcoming move of Racket to the use of Chez affect the comparison between Gerbil and Racket? I'm t…
-
comment
Comment #15396510
I'm afraid I literally laughed out loud at your request for a simple standard algorithm for r5rs macro systems. However, it's a sympathetic laugh. Macro Hygiene is still very hard,…
-
comment
Comment #14061913
You're right that the image is just one source of data. But... that's true of any one source of data. This data doesn't prove anything, it just contributes a bit more evidence (to …
-
comment
Comment #13959551
self-reply: just tried it. It does well. Alarmingly well. so sad to have to choose between Brendan Eich and Mozilla. :(
-
comment
Comment #13959531
so, as someone who keeps meaning to try it out but hasn't yet: how does Brave do with this site?
-
comment
Comment #13959431
Ditto, except that I just use postfix's 'virtual' mechanism. Simple additional hack to simplify address creation; all my legal addresses begin with a particular 4-char sequence, an…
-
comment
Comment #13959407
One data point to the contrary; I subscribed, and I can now view the site without ads. ObDetails: I use ghostery, and I don't block Google Analytics. All other trackers blocked, ac…
-
comment
Comment #13821863
Wow; I really disagree with this viewpoint. I want clever compilers that produce good code from high-level specifications. I fully accept the lack of predictability. Also, your com…
-
comment
Comment #13767470
Looks like another poster mentions " https://meet.jit.si" . Ran a 10-second test, and it looks like it can successfully display my face. Haven't tried it for actual communication.
-
comment
Comment #13478269
There are some very helpful folks on Stack Overflow, but the racket-users mailing list is definitely the authoritative resource. Also, Neil Van Dyke (the package's author) is helpf…
-
comment
Comment #12820042
Yes! I wrote about this in a widely-discussed ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H totally-unread blog post back in 2014: https://www.brinckerhoff.org/blog/2014/12/12/the-why-button/…
-
comment
Comment #12819128
I think that Eve is tackling the wrong problem. Allow me an analogy: "Bronk, the math designed for humans." Instead of dense algebraic expressions like "3x+49", you get to write "t…
-
comment
Comment #11722753
quite a bit longer, though...
-
comment
Comment #11719990
Shameless plug (of my FOSS): if you like Diceware, you might like Molis Hai even better. Maps the 56-bit sequence 0x556bfdce0148c9 to "wrowd aut settea". I betcha the corresponding…
-
comment
Comment #11657930
Is this the same article that appeared in the Communications of the ACM? Not behind paywall, that's a plus. ( http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2699417&CFID=612805967&CFT... )