Viewing profile — jasonsb
jasonsb
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 6:32 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 622
- Public activity
- 141 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jasonsb
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47909118
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47258629
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47051318
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47008731
Because we've passed the point of no return. There's no need for empty mission statements, or even a mission at all. AI is here to stay and nobody is gonna change that no matter wh…
- story
-
comment
Comment #46917575
Love the domain name. How did you manage to snag it?
-
comment
Comment #46656578
> Honest question, if large portions of labor are automated or marginalized who ultimately buys the goods and services that companies produce? Once the robots, energy, and weapons …
-
comment
Comment #46652268
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46652016
I always read and review the code and it's true that the old models from 2023/2024 were using a lot of emojis. But that code was garbage. Since LLMs have started to write decent co…
-
comment
Comment #46651975
Well, it is. Let's say that AI adds emojis to my code/text. Me, a millennial who hates emojis, will tell the AI to delete those emojis and never use them again in my code or my off…
-
comment
Comment #46651671
> Anyone who has had to clean up AI comments riddled with stupid emojis from their code will understand this. I have no idea what you're talking about. I code daily, with 80/90% of…
-
comment
Comment #46348289
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46254217
Does it really matter? Even if a billionaire’s kid gets hooked on Coca-Cola or social media, they still have vastly more resources (therapy, education, support) to overcome it. Mea…
-
comment
Comment #46141165
I'm with you. The industry has pivoted from building tools that help you code to selling the fantasy that you won't have to. They don't care about the reality of the review bottlen…
-
comment
Comment #46131046
No it doesn't, because social media already did that. There's nothing left to be broken.
-
comment
Comment #46112532
It doesn't work like that. You need to actually use the model and then go to /activity to see the actual speed. I constantly get 150-200tps from the Big 3 while other providers bar…
-
comment
Comment #46112261
You're right, I forgot about that one.
-
comment
Comment #46111058
It's all about the hardware and infrastructure. If you check OpenRouter, no provider offers a SOTA chinese model matching the speed of Claude, GPT or Gemini. The chinese models may…
-
comment
Comment #46090864
The average person in the west isn't losing sleep over China either. That anxiety is mostly manufactured by the media pushing the narrative that they are an existential threat. May…
-
comment
Comment #46090684
Tariffs might keep Chinese EVs out of the US, but they don't stop US influence from fading everywhere else. South America is voting with their wallets, and 'buy American' doesn't w…
-
comment
Comment #46077554
Let's meet in the middle: only allow AI data hoarders to train their stuff on your content if the model is open source. I can stand behind that.
-
comment
Comment #46077520
> Could you give some specific examples of AI regulations that you think would be good? Sure, I can give you some examples: - deceiving someone into thinking they're talking to a h…
-
comment
Comment #46077434
Ask yourself: who owns the IP you're defending? It's not struggling artists, it's corporations and billionaires. Stricter IP laws won't slow down closed-source models with armies o…
-
comment
Comment #46077405
> I cannot help but feel that discussing this topic under the blanket term "AI Regulation" is a bit deceptive. I've noticed that whenever this topic comes up, almost every major fi…
-
comment
Comment #46077370
Agreed. Regulate AI? Sure, though I have zero faith politicians will do it competently. But more IP protection? Hard pass. I'd rather abolish patents.