Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jasonlfunk

jasonlfunk

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jun 14, 2013, 2:53 PM UTC
HN karma
1,133
Public activity
278 items

About jasonlfunk

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47298349

    All of society is impacted by terrible parents who raise terrible kids.

  2. comment
    Comment #44443064

    The verb seems pretty important to me… ————- Learn more about [the browser] Never hear about [the browser] again Those links will do very different things.

  3. comment
    Comment #43957776

    Why does the title only mention the US? It can’t do it over Europe either.

  4. comment
    Comment #43425576

    I’m always a bit skeptical about these sorts of things. Perhaps I’m just ignorant about the methods used.. but the amount of data we can get from the most distant known galaxy can’…

  5. comment
    Comment #42853273

    This is exactly right. I'm not sure who should get to decide what the name of the gulf should be, but it shouldn't be Google.

  6. comment
    Comment #42519569

    It’s hard to know what they hope to accomplish with this bill. Anytime you develop custom code, it’s because you need something, well, custom. What are the chances that something c…

  7. comment
    Comment #42360437

    I just hope that the US can ban ads for pharmaceuticals.

  8. comment
    Comment #41535538

    This is 100% a factor. The internet has some pretty dark and nasty corners; therefore so does the model. Seeing it unfiltered would be a PR nightmare for OpenAI.

  9. comment
    Comment #41439217

    Can someone help me understand why it's a problem for companies to train these huge LLM on your copyrighted material? What exactly is the harm that is being done to the copyright h…

  10. comment
    Comment #40800340

    Whether or not this will reduce CO2 is yet to be seen. But it will almost certainly raise the price of beef and dairy products. Taxes on producers inevitably get passed on to consu…

  11. comment
    Comment #40772035

    Isn’t it true that the only thing that LLM’s do is “hallucinate”? The only way to know if it did “hallucinate” is to already know the correct answer. If you can make a system that …

  12. comment
    Comment #40555559

    Certainly there is an upper limit to what our eyes/brains can perceive. I don’t know what it is, but I’d imagine 1 kHz is getting close.

  13. comment
    Comment #40407144

    The author did not commit a logical fallacy. They referenced some people worth reading if you wanted some various opinions on a controversial subject.

  14. comment
    Comment #39623680

    https://twitter.com/aarongraves/status/1765441652120834112 Apple’s justification isn’t too unreasonable.

  15. story
  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #37810264

    I think we should less worried about people believing deep-fakes are real and more worried that politicians (and others) will be able to claim things which they actually said are d…

  18. comment
    Comment #37721297

    I think the important part of the technique is talking about what you see, not the actual act of seeing things. He talks about creating brain pathways between the visual and lingui…

  19. comment
    Comment #37703907

    Sure, but "were they in the office" is /much/ easier to measure at scale. And I'm sure you'd throw a pretty big fit if your pay was docked because the company didn't think you did …

  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #37357662

    And it would only notify someone for human review if a certain threshold was reached; just having one or two violating images would have tripped the system.

  22. comment
    Comment #37047543

    My iphone is telling me that it’s not available in my region (USA).

  23. comment
    Comment #36077550

    When does a thief become a whistleblower? It seems to me that something really dangerous or illegal needs to be going on to morally justify publicly releasing a 100GB worth of (pre…

  24. comment
    Comment #36012029

    I guess I’m confused. I thought the web was already decentralized. Of course individual websites aren’t, but the web itself certainly is.

  25. comment
    Comment #35191275

    Is there a reason not to have another “unbroken” chat instance check the output for violations? It seems like a simple “does the following response violate your rules?” would stop …