Viewing profile — jasonkwon
jasonkwon
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 07, 2016, 7:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 52
- Public activity
- 35 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jasonkwon
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19025108
Network effects don't just exist in tech. Delaware has the most developed corporate law and support services for corporate transactions (you can file charters, mergers, etc. within…
-
comment
Comment #19025066
Yes, this.
-
comment
Comment #19025053
The term sheet we posted is just meant to show what a pretty good term sheet looks like from a good investor. The investor having its legal fees reimbursed by the company is someth…
-
comment
Comment #19025026
Re-vesting schedules are all over the map. Some amount of re-vesting is often required at Series A, but it largely has to do with how vested the founders already are. If for exampl…
-
comment
Comment #19025014
Theoretically this would appear to be true. In practice, the firms that give 1-pagers don't really try to pull a bait and switch like that. They offer the 1-pager so they can close…
-
comment
Comment #19020367
Major investors concept (investor has to have invested at least $X) is often added in the definitives. Longer term sheets just state a threshold dollar amount; shorter ones (like t…
-
comment
Comment #19020308
It can be legally binding.
-
comment
Comment #19020291
You can make arguments like this in negotiations and sometimes they can work. It just depends. As I mentioned elsewhere, this was meant to be more descriptive than prescriptive. Fo…
-
comment
Comment #19020280
Existing employee vesting is generally left alone unless they have something crazy.
-
comment
Comment #19020272
I think it just comes down to risk preferences. If you optimize for a higher valuation and give the investor downside protection for that, then you own more of the business and the…
-
comment
Comment #19020223
probably true
-
comment
Comment #19020206
Annual and quarterly unaudited is normally implied. Sometimes monthly too. Most good Series A investors understand that audited financials don't make sense this early and their law…
-
comment
Comment #19020152
I'm going to answer this question a little differently, because enforceability can also depend on facts and circumstances. Think of the binding / non-binding distinction as more of…
-
comment
Comment #19020046
We send people that link all the time to help them understand option pools. The main point of that post is to make it clear to founders that when an investor is saying they'll inve…
-
comment
Comment #19019989
I wouldn't talk in absolutes because having a ton of negotiating leverage can make everything fair game. But in an run of the mill deal, it's pretty tough to make a VC give up anyt…
-
comment
Comment #19019961
descriptive, but note the comment about the brackets.
-
comment
Comment #19019955
I think you already answered that question in your post. There would be incrementally more proceeds for the founders and employees in an exit that is flat or below the postmoney va…
-
comment
Comment #19019703
Yeah excessive preferences do exactly this. But it's not the preference mechanism as much as what the preference does in relation to business value. Assuming liquidation preference…
-
comment
Comment #19019567
Good question. The anti-dilution right is an adjustment to the investor's shares that occurs when the company does a down-round. The "broad-based" qualifier is a reference to the m…
-
comment
Comment #19019453
Some minor wordsmithing that reflects lawyer and investor /founder preferences happens a fair amount. The veto on company sales breaks founder friendly occasionally (you need a dec…
-
comment
Comment #19019340
It’s meant to provide transparency on what good and clean terms are. It won’t generate negotiating leverage for you if you don’t have any, though on the margins it might help you p…
-
comment
Comment #18102235
The impact on safe investors will be less than in those 2 models because those models assume no pool, ie no hires between Safes and Series A. That’s why I said it was artificial, a…
-
comment
Comment #18098218
yes, that's what we meant by the percentages.
-
comment
Comment #18097871
I answered your first model comparison with point #1. Can't use it here since I don't know what other scenarios you're modeling out. I think points #2 and #3 continue to apply. You…
-
comment
Comment #18097540
Sure - just sent to you.