Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jasonkwon

jasonkwon

HN member
Joined
Mon, Mar 07, 2016, 7:30 PM UTC
HN karma
52
Public activity
35 items

About jasonkwon

Verifying my Blockstack ID is secured with the address 1PP7AJm7WoH4GdD5yxtfqojpqwCXHQWRxn https://explorer.blockstack.org/address/1PP7AJm7WoH4GdD5yxtfqojpqwCXHQWRxn

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #19025108

    Network effects don't just exist in tech. Delaware has the most developed corporate law and support services for corporate transactions (you can file charters, mergers, etc. within…

  2. comment
    Comment #19025066

    Yes, this.

  3. comment
    Comment #19025053

    The term sheet we posted is just meant to show what a pretty good term sheet looks like from a good investor. The investor having its legal fees reimbursed by the company is someth…

  4. comment
    Comment #19025026

    Re-vesting schedules are all over the map. Some amount of re-vesting is often required at Series A, but it largely has to do with how vested the founders already are. If for exampl…

  5. comment
    Comment #19025014

    Theoretically this would appear to be true. In practice, the firms that give 1-pagers don't really try to pull a bait and switch like that. They offer the 1-pager so they can close…

  6. comment
    Comment #19020367

    Major investors concept (investor has to have invested at least $X) is often added in the definitives. Longer term sheets just state a threshold dollar amount; shorter ones (like t…

  7. comment
    Comment #19020308

    It can be legally binding.

  8. comment
    Comment #19020291

    You can make arguments like this in negotiations and sometimes they can work. It just depends. As I mentioned elsewhere, this was meant to be more descriptive than prescriptive. Fo…

  9. comment
    Comment #19020280

    Existing employee vesting is generally left alone unless they have something crazy.

  10. comment
    Comment #19020272

    I think it just comes down to risk preferences. If you optimize for a higher valuation and give the investor downside protection for that, then you own more of the business and the…

  11. comment
    Comment #19020223

    probably true

  12. comment
    Comment #19020206

    Annual and quarterly unaudited is normally implied. Sometimes monthly too. Most good Series A investors understand that audited financials don't make sense this early and their law…

  13. comment
    Comment #19020152

    I'm going to answer this question a little differently, because enforceability can also depend on facts and circumstances. Think of the binding / non-binding distinction as more of…

  14. comment
    Comment #19020046

    We send people that link all the time to help them understand option pools. The main point of that post is to make it clear to founders that when an investor is saying they'll inve…

  15. comment
    Comment #19019989

    I wouldn't talk in absolutes because having a ton of negotiating leverage can make everything fair game. But in an run of the mill deal, it's pretty tough to make a VC give up anyt…

  16. comment
    Comment #19019961

    descriptive, but note the comment about the brackets.

  17. comment
    Comment #19019955

    I think you already answered that question in your post. There would be incrementally more proceeds for the founders and employees in an exit that is flat or below the postmoney va…

  18. comment
    Comment #19019703

    Yeah excessive preferences do exactly this. But it's not the preference mechanism as much as what the preference does in relation to business value. Assuming liquidation preference…

  19. comment
    Comment #19019567

    Good question. The anti-dilution right is an adjustment to the investor's shares that occurs when the company does a down-round. The "broad-based" qualifier is a reference to the m…

  20. comment
    Comment #19019453

    Some minor wordsmithing that reflects lawyer and investor /founder preferences happens a fair amount. The veto on company sales breaks founder friendly occasionally (you need a dec…

  21. comment
    Comment #19019340

    It’s meant to provide transparency on what good and clean terms are. It won’t generate negotiating leverage for you if you don’t have any, though on the margins it might help you p…

  22. comment
    Comment #18102235

    The impact on safe investors will be less than in those 2 models because those models assume no pool, ie no hires between Safes and Series A. That’s why I said it was artificial, a…

  23. comment
    Comment #18098218

    yes, that's what we meant by the percentages.

  24. comment
    Comment #18097871

    I answered your first model comparison with point #1. Can't use it here since I don't know what other scenarios you're modeling out. I think points #2 and #3 continue to apply. You…

  25. comment
    Comment #18097540

    Sure - just sent to you.