Viewing profile — janjones

Clarified my comment a bit, thanks

Then you are already using XMake (albeit a different one than OP), it's the original codename for MSBuild, still present in the code: https://github.com/dotnet/msbuild/blob/main/sr…

Yes, it's contextual. There is more details in this section of the article: Naming Conflicts with Existing Class Members

C# playground (compiler explorer) which runs entirely in a browser (via WebAssembly). Started as an alternative to SharpLab which is not maintained anymore. But it can also do some…

> From a user perspective, "dotnet run" does add a new scripting dialect. By dialect I mean that in CSX, the C# language has subtle differences in behavior compared to CS files (e.…

> You can't do much of anything in .NET without referencing Nuget assemblies. And referencing NuGet assemblies is of course supported via the #:package directive. It's just that re…

> Is #:package really so much nicer than #r "nuget: " as to deserve deviating from .NET Interactive, F# and the existing NuGet picker? (It could be, if properly argued!) Yes, we be…

F# and C# are intentionally different languages, I don't think it makes sense to have 100% equivalent functionality in both. AFAIK, F# already has scripting functionality built in.…

Referencing other projects is currently out of scope (and might always be, file based programs are intended to be simple), you can convert file based programs to full projects thou…

.NET interactive uses a dialect of C# - the script dialect. With file based apps, we strive to use the standard C#, so you can convert file based apps to full projects at any time.…

Assembly references are not really a mainline scenario, hence we support nuget package references only for now. And `#r` is just too opaque (it comes from old times when assembly r…

What do you mean by incompatible? If you mean syntax, that's different intentionally for clarity and also we don't want to create a new C# scripting dialect hence it isn't possible…

For anyone wondering, this is just the IP address written in a different form: https://stackoverflow.com/a/56814434

https://archive.is/Wk6OO

What an irony. If you had Recall or that tool you mention installed, you could probably find it easily :D

https://docs.diversion.dev/

I have done something similar when archiving a dynamic site, serving it as static snapshot for free.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38629814