Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jameslk

jameslk

HN member
Joined
Sun, May 10, 2015, 12:58 AM UTC
HN karma
7,739
Public activity
1,571 items

About jameslk

j@jameskosh.com

https://www.renderbetter.com

https://www.devisedlabs.com

https://twitter.com/JamesKoshigoe

-

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #49099081

    > Since it's a democracy, if it was an issue people cared about, they would have voted in someone in local/state/national level who would oppose surveillance, no? The US is a repre…

  3. comment
    Comment #49089221

    > But a bit weird how a core American "surveillance = big no no" belief was thrown out in a few years. I can't speak for China since I'm not as familiar with that culture, but as f…

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #48738686

    That's wild. If Anthropic is willing to risk ruining the trust of their userbase for the sake of protecting their moat, it makes me wonder how strong of a moat they have to begin w…

  6. comment
    Comment #48737357

    That overall drop in share of income since 2000 is related to the "giant sucking sound" Ross Perot warned about in 1992: "It's pretty simple: If you're paying $12, $13, $14 an hour…

  7. comment
    Comment #48734432

    The submitted title is a bit sensationalist given the article’s conclusion: > Is this decline a distinct change from the recent behavior of the labor share in the U.S.? Along the t…

  8. comment
    Comment #48727266

    The great aging of working populations: China: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Populati... Japan: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/Japan_po..…

  9. comment
    Comment #48666102

    I'm highly anticipating the answer to the great question of life, the universe, and everything On a more serious note, I found this interesting from TFA: > The biggest question, th…

  10. comment
    Comment #48653516

    Most big companies attract rule followers. They err on the side of avoiding taking risks like this, which is why they work there (and why there’s so many in this thread talking abo…

  11. comment
    Comment #48635419

    I honestly can't think of a reason why you bothered say it, given that the quote from TFA addresses it

  12. comment
    Comment #48635046

    That's the point of why they're doing it. From TFA: "Private equity investors are turning to AI-generated replicas of software to assess whether acquisition targets have a competit…

  13. comment
    Comment #48635017

    In the article, they explain the goal of vibe coding prototypes is not to rebuild software, but to test the defensibility of businesses based on their software so they can decide w…

  14. comment
    Comment #48634955

    From TFA: “We are leveraging vibecoding to show what a software company can and can’t do, to understand where it fits in the value chain and to understand whether it is the actual …

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #48577371

    The common thread here is that it is China. Before the 2010s and earlier, the US wasn't so concerned about China, but ever since then, China has been a big US concern for it being …

  17. comment
    Comment #48576443

    > If every company uses the same AI tools to optimise the same metrics, the optimisation itself becomes commodity. Everyone has the same chatbot, the same personalisation engine, t…

  18. comment
    Comment #48563431

    > Rationalizing the policy is a serious error, I think. It's a political move by a group that has more power in conditions of nationalism, economic and otherwise. I think both are …

  19. comment
    Comment #48551419

    Well that's kinda my point. If we could all afford yachts tomorrow because AI robot factories made it a commodity like Swiss watches of yore[0], we'd all be buying yachts. And inst…

  20. comment
    Comment #48551004

    > You are correct that there are additional steps here, but wealth is growing increasingly concentrated, and the burden of proof is on the person claiming that trend won't continue…

  21. comment
    Comment #48549926

    We can’t magically skip steps. It’s like South Park’s underwear gnomes. We’re missing steps in between and hand waving them away

  22. comment
    Comment #48549831

    I’m talking about how many people lived in the past OP said they would be content with 40% less income for less work. That's fine, but I think it misses the point. On a large enoug…

  23. comment
    Comment #48549747

    This discussion thread is so full of slippery slope fallacies and plot holes it’s so hard to take seriously. I think it’s safe to say nobody knows for sure how AI will exactly chan…

  24. comment
    Comment #48549582

    > They will corner finite resources and land. They need a lot of money to do that. Where do they get it all from? Not the jobless masses I presume? Investors don’t usually like to …

  25. comment
    Comment #48549441

    That’s quite a lot of slippery slope hand waving to get there. I’d wager those obstacles will pose a larger challenge than most people in this article’s thread seem to think