Viewing profile — james2doyle
james2doyle
HN member- Joined
- Sun, May 11, 2014, 5:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 858
- Public activity
- 191 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About james2doyle
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/james2doyle; my proof: https://keybase.io/james2doyle/sigs/3yx8K6dwFtyhoCBUzraSx5DeL40Y5Zj1_WDpvmmTWak ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49091478
Nice. I’ve been using the new split tabs in Chrome. Works perfectly. I believe Firefox had this first?
-
comment
Comment #49075939
I used HTMX to serve my HTML partials. My HTML partials got too big. Not HTMXs fault. How do I fix that? Split them up? Use lazy loading? Pagination? That isn’t clear. I settled on…
-
comment
Comment #49075832
Yeah, exactly. People seem to think I was holding it wrong. Maybe! But I gave HTMX an honest try. Another team would have just done a whole React thing, no HATEOAS, boatload of JS,…
-
comment
Comment #49075743
The cards contained a large data table outlining a bunch of attributes across many columns and rows. Not an ideal design but the client wanted those stats included in the card so t…
-
comment
Comment #49075645
Because the form changed based on the selections you made. Like facet search. Say you have a clothing store listing page and you filter for only "Shirts". Well, the filter that has…
-
comment
Comment #49075555
That is what I ended up doing but once I did that, I had a hell of a time getting that dynamic form working well with just the HTMX primitives. I even tried to do two different par…
-
comment
Comment #49075217
It isn’t literally AJAX. Just a catchy name. It is just a fetch wrapper that mimics the $get, $post, etc. API
-
comment
Comment #49075203
To sync the form state based on the current selections in the form. This is often called facets. The form contained many options and as you filtered those options would change. So …
-
comment
Comment #49073464
Exactly. The partial response was 100kb-200kb of HTML + the backend query time. Of course, depending on your filters. But a large chunk of that was just sending down the form on th…
-
comment
Comment #49073348
If I wanted to do that I would have added pagination. But that UX also sucks in a different way. I think dynamically fetching results (ala infinite scroll) would have been more com…
-
comment
Comment #49073165
That is what I did. I was using Astro which has full support for partial HTML via the router
-
comment
Comment #49072139
I actually tried to use HTMX on a site recently. I used the 4.0 beta. The site needed an interactive filterable product-listing-page-type experience to list out all their vendors. …
-
comment
Comment #48922963
There are actually quite a few elements failing the Lighthouse accessibility audit. This page also has 26 emdashes on it. For a page that isn’t an article, that seems pretty high.
-
comment
Comment #48848346
Been using this and GLM 5.2 back and forth. I like the speed of Hy3. Also seems very happy to follow instructions. Still haven’t found any open models that follow instructions as g…
-
comment
Comment #48820594
What if your measure is cost? Or zero-data-retention? Or diversity of inference providers? On those measures it is better.
-
comment
Comment #48820111
Yeah sounds like maybe you got stuck in a loop? If you’re a big Deepseek fan, check out their Codewhale harness. It is actually really slick and you can use your OpenRouter account…
-
comment
Comment #48737058
Tokens and speed are a factor but does it require less back and forth to get things right? Being "fast and cheap but wrong" still has a cost that an otherwise "expensive and slow" …
-
comment
Comment #48735081
I can’t get any tool calls working. Seems to use a ` ` wrapper which the current harnesses I’m using don’t support
-
comment
Comment #48735004
Oh, usually when that is announced the stealth model updates to the unmasked one. They did that with "Ling 2.6 flash" which was elephant-alpha. I guess we may see an update today t…
-
comment
Comment #48652454
Do they still have that issue where it will randomly spit out a string of emojis when using voice to text?
-
comment
Comment #48652439
We sound similar. I have found that the voice to text can often just randomly start spitting out emojis. Did you find that?
-
comment
Comment #48633399
There are some demo spaces using this. This one seems the best (paint your own mask) but it failed on all the images I tried: https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/Moebius
-
comment
Comment #48633186
Like this? https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/Moebius
-
comment
Comment #48576593
Had to disagree with that. However, I don't think you can discount how much Anthropic has been banging the drum about how AI is dangerous (specifically theirs) and an existential t…
-
comment
Comment #48465246
Just last week you could distill using other users responses! Handy!