Viewing profile — jalammar
jalammar
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 22, 2008, 9:16 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 708
- Public activity
- 113 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jalammar
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29305960
Hi HN, This is the first in a series of articles I'm writing to introduce devs to practical applications of large NLP language models (for text generations like GPT and for languag…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #27614614
It's widely used in recommenders based on embeddings. See: https://github.com/spotify/annoy https://github.com/facebookresearch/faiss
-
comment
Comment #27024243
Hi HN, I created this cheat sheet and video as high-level guidance to the major categories of ML explainability research and techniques. It's an area I've been working in the last …
- story
-
comment
Comment #26537798
I wouldn't trust any model to generate text for customers yet. Not even the largest GPT3. There are no guarantees on what they will output and could be damaging to your business. Y…
-
comment
Comment #26537436
Hugging Face has that service https://huggingface.co/pricing
-
comment
Comment #25914276
I didn't come across one yet personally
-
comment
Comment #25855962
Hello HN, author here. Language models are absolutely fascinating tools. I believe it would pay for software engineers to have a sense of their capabilities and how they function. …
- story
-
comment
Comment #25690703
Hey, I feel you! I'm an intuitive learner as well. I wouldn't have been able to learn much in ML if it weren't for people who write and visualize and make the methods accessible to…
-
comment
Comment #25690285
I actually started with PCA. But NMF proved more understandable since negative dimensions in PCA are hard to interpret. I didn't consider UMAP, but would be interested to see how i…
-
comment
Comment #25689899
Interesting. Thanks for sharing your notes on the higher layers. Allow me to repost that to the discussion board on github. I do get your point on interpretation. This work is just…
-
comment
Comment #25689450
These are AI explanation methods. They belong to the toolbox which would include LIME, Shapley values...etc. Input saliency is a gradient-based explanation method.
-
comment
Comment #25689396
Wonderful! Thanks! I am curious about those recent O(L) attention transformers (see slide 106 of http://gabrielilharco.com/publications/EMNLP_2020_Tutorial__... ). If these methods…
-
comment
Comment #25684694
I'd love to look at your group's visualizations! Is it a private repo? because the link doesn't open up. It never stops to blow my mind that we can represent words and concepts in …
-
comment
Comment #25684521
Thanks! Please let me know if you have any feedback!
-
comment
Comment #25684501
What I found most fascinating is identifying neuron firing patterns corresponding to linguistic properties: e.g. groups of neurons that fire in response to verbs, or pronounds. Scr…
-
comment
Comment #25684074
Thank you!
-
comment
Comment #25683813
Hi HN, Author here. I had been fascinated with Andrej Karpathy's article ( https://karpathy.github.io/2015/05/21/rnn-effectiveness/ ) -- especially where it shows neurons being act…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #23973159
Apple Keynote
-
comment
Comment #23972517
Author here. Thank you. I feel an important element of this type of writing is what complexity to show and what to hide at different points. "Magic" is just to say "don't worry abo…