Viewing profile — jaidhyani
jaidhyani
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 26, 2022, 2:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 254
- Public activity
- 35 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jaidhyani
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47963522
I used to work for Meta. I quit largely because of intense frustrations with the company. Meta has made a lot of mistakes, overlooked a lot of harms, and made a lot of short-sighte…
-
comment
Comment #47681770
Said company is literally in court against said government at the moment, after said government attempted to designate it too dangerous to do business with.
-
comment
Comment #44003129
Approximately no one in the community thinks this. If you can go two days in a rationalist space without hearing about "Chesterton's Fence", I'll be impressed. No one thinks they'r…
-
comment
Comment #38730164
Compare the trajectory of the US to other industrialized countries. The best charts I could find on this are from an admittedly-biased think tank, but the sources it's pulling from…
-
comment
Comment #38668039
https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy Quick stats for the US: In 2022, 11.3% of energy was generated by renewables (hydropower, solar, wind, geothermal, bioenergy, wave, and …
-
comment
Comment #38153760
> His actions made perfect sense from his utilitarian Effective Altruist worldview. They don't. Everyone in EA (AFAICT) has been pretty clear about this. Lying and undermining trus…
-
comment
Comment #38153725
I will never cease to wonder at how so many people can blame so much on people trying to take a rigorous approach to world improvement, up to and including "a narcissistic con-man …
-
comment
Comment #37825021
I am begging people to stop confusing "I was unable to get LLM X to do Y using strategy Z" with "All LLMs are categorically unable to do Y".
-
comment
Comment #37825011
As the other commenter said, this is incorrect. The input was a sequence of legal moves (not even "real" moves - most of the training data was synthetically generated with "generat…
-
comment
Comment #37824988
Alternatively, the prior on "this is not possible" is very low because RLHF & Friends have targeted metrics that, inadvertently or not, discourage that outcome.
-
comment
Comment #36995675
Smallpox eradication
-
comment
Comment #35864444
Going to be extremely hard to quantify, ransomware peddlers aren't famous for their meticulous public record-keeping. You could try to sift through all the transactions on the publ…
-
comment
Comment #35769112
Could have gone with "More Comprehensive Metrics Are All You Need"
-
comment
Comment #35642179
This is a weird future.
-
comment
Comment #35609902
GPT-LikeSubscribeAndRingThatBell
-
comment
Comment #35591867
This is true in general but not in the use case they presented. If they had explained why a normalized distribution is useful it would have made sense - but they just describe this…
-
comment
Comment #35591776
Prediction happens at the very end (sometimes functionally earlier, but not always) - most of what happens in the model can be thought of as collecting information in vectors-deriv…
-
comment
Comment #35591663
It depends on the values of the vectors. (4, 4) + (3, 3) results in a new vector (7, 7) which is further away from both contributing vectors than either one was to each other origi…
-
comment
Comment #35591625
The original paper is very good but I would argue it's not well optimized for pedagogy. Among other things, it's targeting a very specific application (translation) and in doing so…
-
comment
Comment #35591598
I endorse all of this and will further endorse (probably as a follow-up once one has a basic grasp) "A Mathematical Framework for Transformer Circuits" which builds a lot of really…
-
comment
Comment #35591571
That's true, but they didn't go into any other applications in this explainer and were presenting it strictly as a next-word-predictor. If they are going to include final softmax, …
-
comment
Comment #35591536
Thanks, that's a really useful intuition!
-
comment
Comment #35591528
TIL. Man, I'm behind on my paper reading.
-
comment
Comment #35591519
I am the guy asked and I endorse this guy's endorsements.
-
comment
Comment #35577318
The way the article presents this is misleading. The attention mechanism builds a new vector as a linear combination of other vectors, but after the first layer these have also all…