Viewing profile — jackson1372
jackson1372
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 25, 2011, 4:19 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 142
- Public activity
- 54 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jackson1372
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39575801
I don't have sources, it's just a rumor.
-
comment
Comment #39575739
It's an open secret that Mistral finetunes on GPT outputs
-
comment
Comment #38051720
claude.ai
-
comment
Comment #37635155
The article doesn't mention two great features on iOS: - Move cursor by tap-and-hold on soace bar - tap-tap for word selection and tap-tap-tap for sentence selection. I use these t…
-
comment
Comment #36733937
Claude Instant 1.1 is a better comparison for the price/performance of GPT-3.5
-
comment
Comment #36683995
GRE writing: 5 for Claude vs 4 for GPT-4 Bar exam: 76.5 for Claude vs 75.7 for GPT-4
-
comment
Comment #35909199
See the pricing PDF[^1] and API docs[^2], but TL;DR: - Price per token doesn't change compared to regular models - Existing api users have access now by setting the `model` param t…
-
comment
Comment #30166783
ANTHROPIC ・ Frontend/UX Engineer ・ SF-based ・ Remote-friendly ・ https://www.anthropic.com Rapidly build prototype interfaces for large language models. Align AI with human values. …
- story
-
story
Best web dev stack for long-term open source SPA
I would like to be able to live the dream: develop an open source app, long term, while staying sane. I’m moving on to a new stage of my academic career and want to invest in learn…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #21733725
Isn't the explanation for this that the world actually does work in some way or other and that it's not just infinite chaos and so if you keep throwing parameters at some problem, …
-
comment
Comment #21730923
The reason you want to over-parameterize your model is that it protects you from "bad bounce" learning trajectories. You effectively spread out your overfitting risk until it's pre…
-
comment
Comment #19378875
If you read between the lines, it's clear that Spotify was able to make a normal watch app. But they wanted to make one that had special functionality not yet allowed by Apple, for…
-
comment
Comment #16258463
But what does 'corresponds more closely to the mathematics' mean? The relevant point is just that the mathematics, alone, doesn't settle the theoretical question. In general, it's …
-
comment
Comment #16256735
All three interpretations are 'just the wave function'. What separates them is the metaphysical interpretation of what is 'behind' the wave function.
-
comment
Comment #16256264
Precisely how to understand causation is controversial. But I'll just say that most philosophers don't find anything incoherent in the idea of nonlocal causation. (Hume's classic a…
-
comment
Comment #16255546
> we have to assume some sort of isomorphism between the map (our theory) and the territory (the world) But a mathematical model != a theoretical model. The very same mathematical …
-
comment
Comment #16255537
> if you already accept "superposition" at the level of quantum states, you don't have to invoke anything new to deal with so-called "collapse" All three interpretations of QM 'acc…
-
comment
Comment #16255198
The standard story about measurement/observation and quantum collapse is not the only interpretation of the available data. There are, broadly, three kinds of interpretations of wh…
-
comment
Comment #15136424
Philosophy PhD Student
-
comment
Comment #15077754
Nissan has been working on this: https://www.wired.com/2017/01/nissans-self-driving-teleopera...
-
comment
Comment #14389931
I'm no expert, but I think this is a "known bug". Russian oligarchs buying property in London, for instance, is a big reason for that market's insane prices. One 'solution' is prop…
-
comment
Comment #14364891
1. I wouldn't put it in terms of time being "more fundamental than physics". We can mean two things by 'physics': the thing that is the object of study in the Physics department or…