Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — izucken

izucken

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 15, 2023, 10:03 AM UTC
HN karma
25
Public activity
28 items

About izucken

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48705835

    The levels of irony here are peaking. - slop article that itself feels AI generated; - using a movie quote, like, from an actor and script and stuff; - a quote that itself is super…

  2. comment
    Comment #48582298

    [flagged]

  3. comment
    Comment #48537384

    "How to protect AI" LOL humanity is fucking done.

  4. comment
    Comment #48502511

    human attention is all you need

  5. comment
    Comment #48440250

    Damn that goalposting issue is so easy to solve! See: - make another bullshit benchmark and name it "humanity's last humanlike intelligence benchmark" and overfit to it; - make ric…

  6. comment
    Comment #48415302

    Absolutely. "non-Cliffordness" by consturction already implies "Cliffordness", which by construction implies "Clifford" and then connects other related things. Magic doesn't do tha…

  7. comment
    Comment #48415055

    Should call the next big physics thing doubtscumbagium...

  8. comment
    Comment #48191606

    Essence of gacha games is predatory monetisation realised via fomo, drip feeding and sex - not numbers.

  9. comment
    Comment #48160087

    The point of all of that is to become god, straight up unironically.

  10. comment
    Comment #48157886

    Births is, sans miscalculation, a number that tracks exact events. Is the "capability" number on these LLM strengh graphs as tangible? I think it would be interesting to visit a re…

  11. comment
    Comment #48131093

    > It's not just impactful, it's consequential

  12. comment
    Comment #47962056

    Yeah but well you see, humans did not go extinct from just asbestos!

  13. comment
    Comment #47915661

    Unfathomable incident: arbitrary entity misusing its arbitrarily assigned unilateral power, following perverted incentives.

  14. comment
    Comment #47861493

    But then he wouldn't have a justification for AI companies to rob people! And you are suggesting robbing himself of this justification!

  15. comment
    Comment #47838525

    I should stop starring as a joke or as a bookmark...

  16. comment
    Comment #47737898

    Because elites hate you moreso than downtrodden (they love miserable people in a sense). You are an independent agent with your own ideas, worst case you are completely orthogonal …

  17. comment
    Comment #47501505

    Huh, casually flexing with a sentient pocket calculator!!!

  18. comment
    Comment #47361250

    Instruction from the user is clear: I should avoid testing on dummies and proceed straight to testing on humans.

  19. comment
    Comment #47353719

    Some parties wouldn't be thrilled about their "source available" getting cleaned this way. So when this gets completed it would only "clean" real open source that can't afford lega…

  20. comment
    Comment #47160550

    I am bitter about this. Do you really with your mind and with your heart believe that: - LLMs are fundamentally fit for this type of comprehension - Misjudgements posted in this th…

  21. comment
    Comment #47156557

    I feel a sort of disappointment in how easily languages got swindled. There is seemingly no winning angle this time. This is the most doomed I've ever felt.

  22. comment
    Comment #47155564

    You've built an interesting statistic from gathering data across the project. The real answer: ai models and agentic apps make building spam tools more simple than ever. All you ac…

  23. comment
    Comment #47155188

    This correlation you are observing is real.

  24. comment
    Comment #47060338

    At my current job I am in deep net LOC negative despite all new features... Somebody is getting fired and sued for stealing all these LOCs from the company...

  25. comment
    Comment #47038174

    The only "satisfying" answer to that for me is: "This question doesn't seem to make sense, could you clarify ...".