Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — iwlbebnd

iwlbebnd

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 11:17 PM UTC
HN karma
-15
Public activity
17 items

About iwlbebnd

Apparently people on HN would prefer to flag and down vote fact based opinions contrary to their group-think bubble than engage in a frank and substantive exchange.

I never broke any guidelines but was banned anyway for expressing views unpopular here.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #13556762

    Apparently I've been shadowed banned yet again despite not breaking any guidelines, way to.go HN Moderation

  2. comment
    Comment #13556592

    You run your proprietary software in a docker container or OS appropriate VM. Problem solved.

  3. comment
    Comment #13467713

    Apparently challenging the uncritical liberal hive mind doesn't indulge your intellectual curiosity. It's better to just shout down views that make you uncomfortable. Didn't realiz…

  4. comment
    Comment #13467213

    If anyone is violating HN guidelines it is you. We have evidence of media collusion with the Democratic party, but you rather engage in name calling and shooting of the messenger.

  5. comment
    Comment #13466830

    Because the traditional media has been completely unbias and fair in their coverage so far? Edit: There are numerous examples of media bias and actual evidence of media collusion w…

  6. comment
    Comment #13466678

    1, your willingness to whitewash the calculated murder of a civilian journalist is chilling, it's hard to believe you argue in good faith. 2. Clapper lying under oath to Congress, …

  7. comment
    Comment #13464713

    "Turns out it kindof doesn't. After some quick reading, [1] a "kill box" is still subject to the standard rules of engagement." If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you. The…

  8. comment
    Comment #13464537

    If you still believe the US military obeys the rule of law, international law, common decency, and their own rules of engagement then you have not been paying attention to 1, the M…

  9. comment
    Comment #13456671

    People should realize that political solutions have failed spectacularly. Technical solutions are the only possible answer, that and cultural responses. Vast state surveillance is …

  10. comment
    Comment #13447831

    Because once you defunct the bad argument, and concisely prove that arguments from authorizity are illegitimate the next step is to silence the person with force. His comments are …

  11. comment
    Comment #13447149

    Interesting how the goal posts keep moving, meanwhile I get down votes and my comments are being removed. Look you're wrong, you're wrong for multiple reasons and this happens all …

  12. comment
    Comment #13446881

    Which is exactly the issue? At any time the server can request a key reset and have messages resent. I don't see how it is at all irrelevant since it is exactly what the cause is h…

  13. comment
    Comment #13445993

    Binaries which have a client-server architecture certainly are. Is the claim the full WhatsApp stack is open to regular indepedent third party security audits from multiple firms?

  14. comment
    Comment #13445834

    Apparently some members are more equal than others since if I tried to post a dozen times in this thread I'd be banned. In fact posting this will likely result in flags and a banni…

  15. comment
    Comment #13440754

    I've largely stopped using chrome on mobile because of the lack of ublock. When I do use chrome it's with JavaScript disabled. Despite a few UI differences switching to Firefox on …

  16. comment
    Comment #13422992

    Ah but technology, specifically the technological process may make tools of us yet. Heidegger's question concerning technology is essential reading, but his basic argument is the t…

  17. comment
    Comment #13395657

    Yes but it is trivial to backdoor closed source software. Introducing backdoors into open source source is also more difficult.