Viewing profile — itschaffey
itschaffey
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 05, 2015, 3:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 19
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About itschaffey
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10097475
What do you think will happen with Angular after 2.0?
-
comment
Comment #10097361
What would you say is the best way to describe React?
-
comment
Comment #10097351
Node haha? Dang. As mentioned in an answer to another comment, perhaps framework was the wrong terminology to use, and something more all-encompassing to reflect what is wanted wou…
-
comment
Comment #10092449
Noted – use of terminology could've been more accurate, but for the purpose of this article we tried to keep it quite simplified. Perhaps the wrong approach with regards to accurac…
-
comment
Comment #10091895
Hi Jonaldomo - could you clarify what you mean?
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #9783570
I think both followup questions are valid. As others have mentioned in addition to yourself, there is wariness of companies' intentions, which ties into getting someone for less/va…
-
comment
Comment #9783435
No need to apologise - it's a perfectly justified way of putting it. Could be considered a cynical view, but justified still.
-
comment
Comment #9783392
Ah, oh dear haha.
-
comment
Comment #9783386
That's fair logic - what if other forms of compensation were included in the listed range? (e.g. top end of band + equity)
-
comment
Comment #9783366
To get in touch/an understanding of the company/team?
-
comment
Comment #9779911
Ah sorry, I've muddled myself somewhat with 'bid to play.' But what you've said here would be appropriate when it comes to the best in their fields. And not just with salary (other…
-
comment
Comment #9779855
Job titles have definitely become weirder/amgbiguous/watered down over time. Instead of salary range, what would interest you? (firm, tech stack, vision?)
-
comment
Comment #9779409
That's a reasonable assumption in all fairness. And I would agree that the other 'perks/benefits' need championing in cases where firms can't match market value (whether it be equi…
-
comment
Comment #9779387
'Decent' could have a connotation of 'good' (though that depends on the source, and the location targeted) - it's in my vernacular, but would agree, it can certainly be offputting,…
-
comment
Comment #9779305
Enjoying it at the end of the day is the key thing, on a personal level and as a team. Shame it ended, but seems an understandable reason. Now, having an ex-POTUS reading their is …
-
comment
Comment #9779188
It is admittedly not a totally methodical study, but the discussion is sort of compelling. Human nature would suggest as much (we'd certainly hope for reciprocations of actions tha…
-
comment
Comment #9779155
a-d are all valid points, and (c) is certainly one crux when it comes to listing a higher-paying jobs - is listing 'competitive' the only way of combatting this (what about the app…
-
comment
Comment #9779117
Great point re: salary bands, and existing employees reading listed job openings. Each side of the bands/'competitive' debate has +/-s for sure. By 'bid to play' do you mean a 'rac…
-
comment
Comment #9778735
Mm, it does suggest value in an acknowledging way. Any other words/phrases you've seen in your job travels/perusings haha (for better or worse)?
-
comment
Comment #9778712
So a displayed salary range (perhaps $5-15k in swing?) in any case offers something more tangible/clear than 'competitive'? I could certainly agree with that. It doesn't confine a …
-
comment
Comment #9778423
Your rationale is certainly a strong one - salary is but only one consideration in the end. What was your experience with the former white panther like?
-
comment
Comment #9778400
'Decent' is brilliant haha! :) Not seen that one yet. Your modus operandi, and note of caution are also spot on IMO. Transparency (not just on salary, but role/skill expectations t…