Viewing profile — isthatart
isthatart
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jan 28, 2018, 4:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 48
- Public activity
- 56 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About isthatart
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18184216
From the pdf at the end of the article, this estimate is based on a study of 19000 consumers from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Nethe…
-
comment
Comment #18134360
The Science Advances article is http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/10/eaat3807 "Seventeen surgeons and 13 medical students participated in this study." According to Table S1 …
-
comment
Comment #18119529
Links to drafts?
-
comment
Comment #18112646
Ha, like Eve's sniffer ring from my Internet of Smells story http://telegra.ph/Internet-of-Smells-04-26
-
comment
Comment #17969077
But what if it is not a copyright violation but it looks like one to some dumb filter? For say 0.5 million articles from arXiv?
-
comment
Comment #17969010
Sure, they are not published illegally. IANAL but as I understand the process, is like this: the author submits to arXiv and either (a) gives arXiv a perpetual NON-EXCLUSIVE licenc…
-
comment
Comment #17968853
But arXiv is not small, it has 1.4 million e-prints, is far bigger than most of other scientific platforms. It is non-commercial though.
-
comment
Comment #17968362
Thank you. Anybody who has any influence in the discussion, please help to make this clear. It is important for the researchers, I think. In this particular case arXiv is by no mea…
-
comment
Comment #17968246
Well in mathematics and physics the usual thing to do is to first post on arXiv and then submit to the journal. ArXiv references are totally allowed. I heard that the situation is …
-
comment
Comment #17968223
Right, will arXiv implement such filters? Same question for other green or gold OA platforms. We all know about Elsevier, but if I put my paranoid hat then for gold OA this is even…
-
comment
Comment #17968029
Oh I replied to another comment. The answer is "no". Fact is that 1/3 (anyway a significant proportion which can be referenced) of the arXiv articles appear later in journals. So i…
-
comment
Comment #17967999
Why not? AFAIK about a 1/3 of the arXiv articles are later published in journals.
-
comment
Comment #17967965
I'd like to see a discussion around these aspects. I see only cries re big platforms and news outlets.I'm neither of these.
-
comment
Comment #17967951
Two more examples examples for arXiv and one for Figshare. (1) Article in journal has a flaw. For some reason the journal is slow or unhelpful concerning a correct version, so the …
-
comment
Comment #17967848
Example: article in arXiv gets later published in a journal. Will the arXiv article version be still available for anybody? Only for non-EU people? Will be removed from arXiv? None…
-
comment
Comment #17967702
As a EU researcher, reader and author, I ask: does this reform affect my use of arXiv or say figshare? Until now I don't have a clear answer.
-
comment
Comment #17837908
... and if in doubt you'd better call Saul!
-
comment
Comment #17828256
Earth is flat and the theory of evolution is bogus. You will not allow and will not allow any third party to publish or provide any benchmark or comparison test results. Done with …
-
comment
Comment #17711123
True for both comments. In the case of the "ideal" lisp machine, in my mind should be something which rewrites local patterns in memory, randomly, in many places. It is possible, t…
-
comment
Comment #17707711
My guess is that because the accent was put on serial computations. I may be wrong but for for me the big selling point of a(n ideal) lisp machine is that if made right you could c…
-
comment
Comment #17637058
Or chemlambda https://github.com/chorasimilarity/chemlambda-gui/blob/gh-pa...
-
comment
Comment #17637030
See section V Simulation Results https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.05308.pdf
-
comment
Comment #17587247
Latest version https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.10228v2 For me the takeaway message is: "Fabric is the first blockchain system to support the execution of distributed applications writte…
-
comment
Comment #17477758
After more reading, it is horrible. Even if the answers seem to be (0) no (1) maybe (2) yes, the main point of interest for researchers is that they will become publishers slaves, …
-
comment
Comment #17471668
Open Science fan here, I have some concrete questions about this copyright, publishers and linktax story, for example: (0) - will Scihub be affected? (1) - will arXiv link instead …