Viewing profile — iskin
iskin
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 21, 2012, 2:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 244
- Public activity
- 83 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About iskin
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #28667597
I started to mention Colorette when author asked me. First mention (it was changed later) was added 6 days ago (threat was created 2 days ago): https://www.npmjs.com/package/nanoco…
-
comment
Comment #28667183
In my PRs I replace chalk to nanocolors
-
comment
Comment #28665185
I copied one file and I didn't know a way to keep the history of this file. When people later explained how to keep the history of single file I tried to restored it.
-
comment
Comment #28664793
This is Nano Colors author. Even before this Twitter thread we had talk with Colorette author and I added mention to the docs, his name to LICENSE and promised him to not replace C…
-
comment
Comment #28664699
Sure. The first note was added 5 days ago https://www.npmjs.com/package/nanocolors/v/0.1.2 Seems like people are confused by git rebase which change commit time in GitHub.
-
comment
Comment #28664666
As I mention here, because Nano Colors it's not just fork of Colorette. It was created as a mix of Colorette and kleur. https://twitter.com/sitnikcode/status/1441827379454746637?s=…
-
comment
Comment #28664279
I mentioned Colorette in docs and license even before this Twitter thread. Why is it a stealing?
-
comment
Comment #28664172
When was another time?
-
comment
Comment #28663895
> albeit after being called out Nano Colors mentioned Colorette in docs and Colorette author in LICENSE before Twitter thread. Colorette’s author asked m and I add the mention and …
-
comment
Comment #28663873
I am mentioning it in Babel PRs: > It will have a good support. My other projects from nano-series like very popular Nano ID shows a minimal number of bugs and excellent response t…
-
comment
Comment #28663862
I added Colorette mention before the Twitter thread. Just after Colorette’s author asked me. We even agreed on text form of this mention. He started Twitter thread because of my PR…
-
comment
Comment #28663829
Check project’s history. I added Colorette mention in docs and LICENSE just after Colorette’s author asked me (before the Twitter thread). We even agreed on the text. Colorette’s a…
-
comment
Comment #28663305
Nano Colors is mentioning Colorette in docs, COPYRIGHT and keep git history. If Nano Colors are following all Colorette’s author asks, why he didn’t do it in return?
-
comment
Comment #28663247
It was added in the first day, when Colorette author wrote me. We even agreed on the attribute text.
-
comment
Comment #28663154
I completely agree with it. This is why I used Colorette for a year, promote it and send PRs there. https://twitter.com/sitnikcode/status/1441824191624486924 For for created becaus…
-
comment
Comment #28663121
I mentioned him in docs, COPYRIGHT and keep the origin history? I clearly explain the reasons of fork creation and the changes https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/wiki/Colorette-Chang…
-
comment
Comment #28663112
Why it is a unattributed fork if Colorette is mentioned in docs, COPYRIGHT and origin commits are in history?
-
comment
Comment #28663094
Any ANSI color library is a very simple thing. Nano Colors mentioned Colorette in docs, COPYRIGHT and keep origin git history. If Nano Colors was open about credits, why Colorette’…
-
comment
Comment #28662818
You have a new benchmark results after you backported Nano Colors optimizations and refused to mentioned it https://github.com/jorgebucaran/colorette/issues/78 Just look at perform…
-
comment
Comment #28662805
I promote PostCSS alternatives in PostCSS twitter account https://twitter.com/PostCSS/status/777344095748579328