Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ishishkin

ishishkin

HN member
Joined
Wed, Nov 25, 2020, 10:03 PM UTC
HN karma
3
Public activity
14 items

About ishishkin

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #25442757

    I assume you agree with my argument. It's reasonable to assume that block delay in PoW network has log-normal distribution too. Let's see what will happen if we add delay due to th…

  2. comment
    Comment #25289127

    > There's some confusion in this question. A log normal distribution is proof enough that multiplication exists. Ha-ha. Maybe it's a good reason to forge the evidence. However, it …

  3. comment
    Comment #25277550

    Don't you think this claim should be supported by some reputable secondary source?

  4. comment
    Comment #25276767

    You appeal to your intuition. However, it could be misleading. Log-normal distribution has been found in many real world processes. Could you explain where is multiplication in cas…

  5. comment
    Comment #25276516

    > Not sure what these two versions of the blockchain you're talking about are. Really?! One version is "Vitalik's fork" and another one is "non-Vitalik's fork". Which one of them i…

  6. comment
    Comment #25273951

    > Vitalik Buterin came up with a solution for the nothing-at-stake problem Is that a link to an article from a peer reviewed academic journal? > There are several PoS networks out …

  7. comment
    Comment #25273510

    But it doesn't mean there should be a normal distribution there! Have you ever heard about log normal distribution?

  8. comment
    Comment #25273474

    Is that a link to fairy tales from Vitalik? The fact that "stateless client" is written in Ethereum 2.0 roadmap is an evidence that this project has no future.

  9. comment
    Comment #25273455

    What has happened in 2014? Is that a time when brain-washing campaign in crypto-media has been started? "Slashing" is not a solution to this problem.

  10. comment
    Comment #25273418

    > They get slashed when anyone submits evidence of them doing this. Who will record this "evidence" to the blockchain? Anyway there will be two versions of the blockchain. In one o…

  11. comment
    Comment #25215303

    > ... both of your big-O comments have counter examples (check out Coda for 1) Have you ever checked on your own any such "counter example"?

  12. comment
    Comment #25215196

    Block propagation time is only a part of the problem and it doesn't make sense to consider it separately from other parameters. By the way, why do you think block times in PoS have…

  13. comment
    Comment #25215071

    But at what cost? There is no chance it could preserve the same level of decentralization.

  14. comment
    Comment #25214854

    There is no validation of blocks in a "stateless manner". Network is secured by those validators who know what they validate.