Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — irfansharif

irfansharif

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jun 14, 2016, 4:34 AM UTC
HN karma
1,122
Public activity
166 items

About irfansharif

irfansharif.io/blog

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #34005833

    If you're just using the pre-compiled binaries, this Go patch is baked in. If you're building the CockroachDB binary from source, and are just following our usual build steps using…

  2. story
  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #27200840

    (crdb eng) I'm not sure what "document DB" means here, mind elaborating?

  5. story
  6. story
  7. comment
    Comment #25455570

    Yes, the distributed backup/restore functionality was folded into the free version in our last release. See https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/distributed-backup-restor... .

  8. comment
    Comment #25047977

    (crdb eng here) I'll shamelessly call out that distributed backup/restore, which was previously in our enterprise offering, was moved into the free one. Internally a large part of …

  9. comment
    Comment #23835072

    Click around through the rest of their blog if you're interested in what those tradeoffs are. Let's not spread FUD unnecessarily.

  10. comment
    Comment #23815376

    It's not, not at all. We've actually gone as far as replacing RocksDB with https://github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/ by default now (and it's written in Go).

  11. comment
    Comment #23633955

    what "data warehousing"/"data management" tools are missing?

  12. story
  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #22854913

    > Note that neither CockroachDB [...] use Golang for their actual storage engine We do, now. We're looking to move away from RocksDB to https://github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/ .

  15. comment
    Comment #22618573

    Congrats on the launch! If you're looking at CockroachDB (looking at some other comment on this thread), you should reach out to us if you haven't already. Your design here seems l…

  16. comment
    Comment #22360324

    (Linked in the post but) github repo: https://github.com/MaterializeInc/materialize

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #22299949

    I have no idea what you're saying. What's a "row-oriented storage" if not storing all the column values of a row in sequence, in contrast to storing all the values in a column acro…

  19. comment
    Comment #22299625

    > Actually, I always believed that the internal key-value store that they use would never scale to represent table workloads. Care to elaborate here? As someone working at that lay…

  20. comment
    Comment #22265543

    > Just, please, pretty please, give us a --insecure Have you taken a look at [0]? (All caveats around running an insecure cluster apply) [0]: https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/sta…

  21. comment
    Comment #22265481

    TrueTime is not a publicly available GCP service.

  22. comment
    Comment #22265471

    We take our claims if correctness very seriously. The behavior you're describing, depending on exactly what you're doing, is likely an allowed serializable history, which is the is…

  23. comment
    Comment #22265414

    CockroachCloud has public pricing. https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/cockroachcloud/stable/coc...

  24. comment
    Comment #22262716

    As someone working for crdb, I disagree with you re: "the whole point is that it enables Google scale". There's a wide gulf up to that point that cockroachdb is still imminently us…

  25. comment
    Comment #22198785

    CockroachDB runs the Jepsen test suite nightly. We've been following along Aphyr's recent test additions (`multi-register` for instance, which immediately caught [0]), porting them…