Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — intern4tional

intern4tional

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 04, 2015, 6:43 PM UTC
HN karma
470
Public activity
111 items

About intern4tional

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/intern4tional; my proof: https://keybase.io/intern4tional/sigs/Jl0IBSUnUiIqJ1H9pqwOiTPZPHCzcl4VzbJGsIJ00eU ]

I am a senior staff software security engineer.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49251328

    The requirement for hardware security keys ties the use of these models even tighter to a specific identity. This will limit ability to scale or share the model.

  2. comment
    Comment #49063157

    Interesting article but doesn't seem to understand how security teams work or even how to address a threat outside of an brittle easily bypassed response. The initial report was in…

  3. comment
    Comment #48105476

    arene_base provides low level C++ facilities to help development of safety critical software in compliance with Woven by Toyota's C++ development best practices.

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #46508084

    You misunderstand. Ben is a random engineer, he is definitely not the proper point of contact. FOSS compliance is serious, so if this is real, do escalate it.

  6. comment
    Comment #46508075

    Correct, that was my intent - Ben isn't the proper channel as he is just an engineer responding to comments here. Stuff like this is serious and so should be escalated. Compliance …

  7. comment
    Comment #46506747

    Nothing. This isn't something that is even tracked. AI usage is obviously encouraged but HR has far better things to do than go gather this kind of data. Internally, depending on w…

  8. comment
    Comment #46506686

    Assuming this is real and you have the authority to share your work from previous location; you should reach out and contact Microsoft Legal directly. A random engineer on Hacker N…

  9. comment
    Comment #42083494

    QNX is heavily used in industries where functional safety or particular high assurance models are required. Sure FreeRTOS has a SafeRTOS mode, but its not sufficiently functional f…

  10. comment
    Comment #41479671

    He was freed in 2020: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/02/man-who-refused-...

  11. comment
    Comment #41116381

    https://web.archive.org/web/20061023112233/http://software.s... "Microsoft made both changes in response to antitrust concerns from the European Commission. Led by Symantec, the wo…

  12. comment
    Comment #41099106

    Windows does have the ability to have sovereign builds (and has had this since 2016?), but the capability wasn't present when the decision was made (in 2006). Windows build is comp…

  13. comment
    Comment #41098077

    Industry forum was external, MS did not start that. I do not know enough to properly answer on the concrete reasons why, only that it was external. Sorry.

  14. comment
    Comment #41097404

    As someone that worked at MS, on a team that worked directly on this issue (among other things) some years ago, MS did figure out better solutions and did discuss it with industry.…

  15. comment
    Comment #41097067

    Here's an actual compliant at MS to the EU from an anti-malware vendor: https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/news/450420491/Mic... This is and has been a thing for quite some …

  16. comment
    Comment #41097035

    There is basis for that assertion. Via Google: https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/news/450420491/Mic... (Also via myself, as I was at MS when we wanted to make this change a…

  17. comment
    Comment #41029853

    So the grandparent poster has a fundamental misunderstanding of how Windows works, and why CrowdStrike has a kernel driver in the first place. Microsoft has long desired to kick AV…

  18. comment
    Comment #40972295

    I think returning results in a timely manner is more than an acceptable assumption. The poster clearly thought about search in terms of the existing Google search functionality whi…

  19. comment
    Comment #40594714

    This makes it something that the average person cannot do; you're suggesting something that already requires more time and resources than 75% of the population has access to. If yo…

  20. comment
    Comment #38935914

    I don’t disagree with this either, I just didn’t think of it when I put my response in. Naming and shaming does work.

  21. comment
    Comment #38935910

    Of course, but it that’s good in most cases as then you don’t get an overreaction. The right people will read it (Chattr.ai’s customers) and respond . Right now everyone looks at i…

  22. comment
    Comment #38935897

    Title: I pwned Chattr.ai via Firebase misconfiguration That’s what you should call it. It explains to readers what’s going on without over sensationalism. That isn’t too long eithe…

  23. comment
    Comment #38935880

    No, as company employee is directly tied to and the responsibility of the company. These companies are responsible for their employees behavior and data but they are not responsibl…

  24. comment
    Comment #38934827

    This isn’t owning fast food chains; rather compromising some AI startup that has some of them as a customer. Title is misleading.

  25. comment
    Comment #38767685

    So this is mostly a solved problem at other OEMs, and I do not know how Ford does it. I know that other OEMs do variant testing, have complex SILS (software in the loop) test syste…