Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — inteoryx

inteoryx

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 04, 2021, 8:47 PM UTC
HN karma
193
Public activity
37 items

About inteoryx

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30309853

    I wonder if, setting quality aside, the kinds of tricks (is "tricks" right?) that skaters do becomes more similar with technology. That is, skater X was going to do some random tri…

  2. comment
    Comment #30309806

    Your comment is a bit ironic in the sense that I can tell you didn't read the article because you reproduce conclusions from the article. That's okay! Obviously you didn't need to …

  3. comment
    Comment #30309519

    For the title, I did say "At Harvard" and not "In Harvard" or "By Harvard". I think the student newspaper is indeed at Harvard. I'm also pretty clear about what text I'm looking at…

  4. comment
    Comment #30309455

    One nice thing about getting feedback is learning all of the additional stuff I should have included in the blog post. I did look at number of articles per year, and it fluctuates,…

  5. comment
    Comment #30308671

    I had a similar intuition and graphed unique words per year while writing this. I found, surprisingly, that actually the reverse was true. Unique words per year go up, even as dive…

  6. comment
    Comment #30308543

    I suppose "old fashioned" is much more of a subjective measurement than an objective one. At first I was going to rate "snail" as not at all old fashioned, since we still use the w…

  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #27231303

    Thanks so much. You've really gone above and beyond with this comment. I very much appreciate it. I've made a couple tweaks that may resolve the issue. If you have a chance to take…

  9. comment
    Comment #27227349

    Thanks for letting me know and the details. I will look into it and correct it if I am able.

  10. comment
    Comment #27226966

    Hmm. That is odd, and not behavior I see in either Firefox or Chrome. I'm afraid my knowledge of CSS is insufficient to explain why that might be happening. What OS are you using? …

  11. comment
    Comment #27226501

    I was just trying to glibly acknowledge that some tweets are in a different language. I didn't filter those out. I do expect it will hinder the user's ability to tell which is offe…

  12. comment
    Comment #27226425

    Were the images loading by default for you? I intended to set it up so that the images showed up as links for you to click if you wanted to or not - and there is a warning above th…

  13. comment
    Comment #27226343

    I'm not surprised that it works poorly. I am surprised that it seems to work randomly though. I would understand if every Tweet that had a curse word in it was marked offensive, an…

  14. comment
    Comment #27226323

    The order of the questions is random per user, so not everyone will have the same 3rd set of Tweets. I'm not sure if Twitter's algorithm is detecting a political bias and that dete…

  15. comment
    Comment #27226243

    I think it depends on how you mean that. One way to imagine the phrase is to think about people with cloistered views in politics, religion, social views, etc. These people could g…

  16. comment
    Comment #27226175

    The frustrations for honest webpage developers and users are but another casualty from the aggressive advertising industry.

  17. comment
    Comment #27226160

    I've seen tweets that are nothing but innocuous gifs get marked as offensive. Several examples in there are people responding to k-pop Tweets with identical statements (e.g. "I lik…

  18. comment
    Comment #27226028

    An earlier idea I had for this was to put two tweets side by side and ask the user to say which tweet was more offensive. Then, I figured I could use the ELO rating system to come …

  19. comment
    Comment #27225872

    Hmm, that's unfortunate. I had considered loading the tweets as images instead of actually embedding them. I hadn't realized ad/tracking protectors might block the tweets, or else …

  20. comment
    Comment #27225811

    I think if you could genuinely identify offensive tweets then you could hide them from people who prefer that. It would make the user experience more pleasant. Few people want to b…

  21. comment
    Comment #27225791

    That's true, but the end result, no matter how complicated their algorithm is, is that they don't seem to be doing a very good job of distinguishing offensive from inoffensive twee…

  22. comment
    Comment #27225785

    Two possibilities. Someone else mentioned that their ad/tracking protection was causing a problem. I can only guess that this is blocking my attempt to embed tweets in the quiz. If…

  23. comment
    Comment #27225731

    That's true. I could have added a "Neither is offensive" button, but my goal was just to show that you can't really tell the difference between what Twitter is doing and random cha…

  24. comment
    Comment #27225704

    You had to disable enhanced tracking to get the quiz to work? That's surprising to me. Were the tweets not loading in the quiz without it? I'm using Twitter's JS library to embed t…

  25. comment
    Comment #27225385

    One problem is that it's hard to see how decentralizing work for profit could ever be more efficient than centralizing it. In the decentralizing case you must do the additional wor…