Viewing profile — intelfx
intelfx
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Sep 15, 2015, 12:47 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 25
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About intelfx
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45973054
> post exposure vaccination is a thing?? does it work for everything I believe in this discussion the context is specifically rabies. > and why is it called vaccination not treatme…
-
comment
Comment #43014596
> Would you really feel better if he said, "I think a multi-language approach is a very bad idea, it will inevitably spread, and it will end up causing systemic problems far away f…
-
comment
Comment #43012465
Echoing @steveklabnik's words, you're just hanging up on the semantics of how a particular insult has been made. This does not refute or diminish the fact of an insult. If I active…
-
comment
Comment #43012007
> And nuclear power is judged, fairly or unfairly, by Chernobyl Proves the GP's point exactly.
-
comment
Comment #42982211
Saying "I do not trust you, so I'm going to stonewall your entire work with which you could have built that trust" is not viable either. Besides, none of this was said. Hellwig did…
-
comment
Comment #42763756
> somehow my matrix room continued to run without me hosting it, and without an admin running it Surprise, this is probably the primary architectural feature of Matrix. This is pre…
-
comment
Comment #41512307
This strikes me as entirely missing the idea of Radicle. What you are saying is basically "why automate things if you can just do them manually". But worse is not better; there is …
-
comment
Comment #40234804
run0 does not send any signal to polkit, systemd does.
-
comment
Comment #40234782
> The problem with systemd is that it's a mediocre solution to many problems [citation needed]
-
comment
Comment #40234774
> I admit I haven't really seen a huge advantage to using systemd-networkd over NetworkManager yet I don't think there is one. systemd-networkd is explicitly not for dynamic enviro…
-
comment
Comment #40234760
> If it actively solved problems for the majority of users we wouldn't hate it so much It does and we don't. The only "we" who are "hating it so much" is a tiny vocal minority.
-
comment
Comment #40234719
In the same vein, sorry it doesn't work for you, but that has not been the prevailing experience ;) (Same goes for "unpolished and flaky".)
-
comment
Comment #40234699
> There's like 3 components involved in making setuid safe (the kernel, the dynamic loader, and your exec), and at least one of them wasn't doing its job correctly (the dynamic loa…
-
comment
Comment #40234624
I mean, systemd-run could do privilege escalation from day one. It's even the default (otherwise overridable by systemd-run -pUser= ). I have used systemd-run --shell on countless …
-
comment
Comment #29309656
Ironically, that's exactly what the moderation team seems to insinuate with their "extreme skepticism" claim. "You don't know the story, we won't tell any of the events leading up …
-
comment
Comment #27013169
Fast compiling isn't really compatible with reproducible builds, is it?
-
comment
Comment #24177365
The downside of the "true history" approach, besides obvious aesthetic reasons, is that it precludes the use of such tools as `git bisect` and `git blame`.
-
comment
Comment #24175756
> but you'd be more efficient at it if you develop the full metabolic machinery for it by specifically targeting it Would you mind expanding on this? Or maybe some general links as…
-
comment
Comment #11004460
Did you hear about "hybrid MBR"?
-
comment
Comment #10218392
Goddamn, guys, stop repeating the same absurd. kdbus is NOT ONLY about performance. It's about the lifetimes, the availiability in the early userspace, the new marshalling format, …
-
comment
Comment #10218360
Just as a side note to side note (preemptive strike against accusations of systemd for using gotos) — the Linux kernel has many of them either. This is idiomatic C-style error hand…