Viewing profile — inspectorSlap
inspectorSlap
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 05, 2026, 12:28 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About inspectorSlap
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49188447
Not a lot that can. LLM proof fonts are spotty at best, I moved my hands up an to the right 3 keys and kept typing and i may as well of changed my font as obfuscated my message. I …
-
comment
Comment #49181828
First off, everyone here knows that a cybersecurity vulnerability audit is a hack request, and you don't hack without rolling up your sleeves and digging through the trash first, m…
-
comment
Comment #49095809
these can work as long as the evidence is attached (to your point). And in healthcare absolutely must (your EMR example is terrifying). The patient may be allergic to nuts (confide…
-
comment
Comment #49090826
I'm working on a universal one. My belief is that as agentic capabilities increase, behavioral attribution will be increasingly needed to maintain quality.
-
comment
Comment #49086237
Agreed. However my research is showing that saturation of the rubric occurs in unique configuration that drive the transfer curve to near binary. Effectively turning a 1-10 rating …
-
comment
Comment #49086022
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48839134
Has anyone actually used Grok to code? How does he do?
-
comment
Comment #48822109
This is exactly right. Abstracted out of the process, or to a point of most optimal application.
-
comment
Comment #48822022
I find some of the most interesting, and catastrophic failures in my agent fine-tuning come from the clamping down of non-determinism. It is totally the correct approach, but must …
-
comment
Comment #48806925
I think stochastic parroting is really a very accurate description of what they do (if underserving of the overall usefulness of LLMs). As long as you consider they are parroting f…
-
comment
Comment #48794517
[flagged]