Viewing profile — inputmice
inputmice
HN member- Joined
- Sun, May 29, 2016, 8:02 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 150
- Public activity
- 56 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About inputmice
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47323483
The blog post you are referencing explains the changes the XMPP community has to do to keep up with what Lets encrypt did. TLDR: People just need to upgrade their servers.
- story
-
comment
Comment #46085966
Maybe the first but not the only one. Ltt.rs (an email client using JMAP) does this as well. BTW you can also directly deliver WebPush notifications to FCM servers. No need for a p…
-
comment
Comment #41203882
There are certificates that are valid for the XMPP domain example.com but not for the regular (HTTP) server on example.com. Off-the-shelf verifier don’t have support for that.
-
comment
Comment #41202522
* Conversations uses two different OpenPGP implementations. (It doesn’t) * The auth tag truncation was 'silently' introduced in the spec. It wasn’t. The author retracted that but o…
-
comment
Comment #41202383
> Also relevant https://soatok.blog/2024/08/04/against-xmppomemo/ recently. Signal, Matrix, Telegram, XMPP; Use whatever you want. But there is a lot of FUD if not outright lies in…
-
comment
Comment #41202355
> and attacks like this are just downright scary > https://notes.valdikss.org.ru/jabber.ru-mitm/ With an up to date Conversations on a modern server we have a pretty good chance to…
-
comment
Comment #34382900
JMAP (IMAP+Submission replacement) has support for WebPush. If I have a minute I’ll implement UnifiedPush in https://Ltt.rs - Sadly JMAP doesn’t have a lot of server implementation…
-
comment
Comment #31142003
> Causing all extensible JSON-based protocols to eventually reinvent them: That's funny because it's true. To add to your list: JMAP ( https://jmap.io/ ) has namespaces too.
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #26803764
Quicksy.im / Conversations.im developer here. I promise I’ll never implement crypto currency into my messenger apps.¹ Even if I break my promise you could just use a fork of my app…
-
comment
Comment #25383259
The existing JMAP bridge is broken. But it would cool if 'IMAP API' used JMAP instead of coming up with its own protocol. (Which covers a very similar feature set than JMAP) This w…
-
comment
Comment #25378663
> If your use-case is just wanting to fetch emails from a bunch of inbox folders in real-time, potentially with some querying/filtering, Nobody says you need to implement all of JM…
-
comment
Comment #25336704
https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html :)
-
comment
Comment #24496233
As someone who has thought a good deal about contact discovery the mitigation techniques section is actually pretty interesting. Quicksy.im, an XMPP client but based on phone numbe…
-
comment
Comment #24145290
Congratulations on acquiring the funding. > Support for encrypted two-party calls that are compatible with Conversations should be ready by the end of this year or early next year.…
-
comment
Comment #23995267
Two issues here: Models like these existed. Flattr and Liberapay. The latter had to switch away from the pooling model because turns out when you do the pooling you essentially bec…
-
comment
Comment #23974041
Does this mean we are only 10 years away from fusion?
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #22459527
The problem JMAP is addressing is quite complex that’s why the JMAP spec is long. I do not however find it to be bloated. On the contrary I actually found it quite easy to read. (I…
-
comment
Comment #22413328
I bought a T495 recently. It’s the worst ThinkPad I ever owned. (After a T60, a X301 and a X250). With modern ThinkPads you have the choice between slightly thicker notebooks T4… s…
- comment
- comment