Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — inputmice

inputmice

HN member
Joined
Sun, May 29, 2016, 8:02 AM UTC
HN karma
150
Public activity
56 items

About inputmice

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47323483

    The blog post you are referencing explains the changes the XMPP community has to do to keep up with what Lets encrypt did. TLDR: People just need to upgrade their servers.

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #46085966

    Maybe the first but not the only one. Ltt.rs (an email client using JMAP) does this as well. BTW you can also directly deliver WebPush notifications to FCM servers. No need for a p…

  4. comment
    Comment #41203882

    There are certificates that are valid for the XMPP domain example.com but not for the regular (HTTP) server on example.com. Off-the-shelf verifier don’t have support for that.

  5. comment
    Comment #41202522

    * Conversations uses two different OpenPGP implementations. (It doesn’t) * The auth tag truncation was 'silently' introduced in the spec. It wasn’t. The author retracted that but o…

  6. comment
    Comment #41202383

    > Also relevant https://soatok.blog/2024/08/04/against-xmppomemo/ recently. Signal, Matrix, Telegram, XMPP; Use whatever you want. But there is a lot of FUD if not outright lies in…

  7. comment
    Comment #41202355

    > and attacks like this are just downright scary > https://notes.valdikss.org.ru/jabber.ru-mitm/ With an up to date Conversations on a modern server we have a pretty good chance to…

  8. comment
    Comment #34382900

    JMAP (IMAP+Submission replacement) has support for WebPush. If I have a minute I’ll implement UnifiedPush in https://Ltt.rs - Sadly JMAP doesn’t have a lot of server implementation…

  9. comment
    Comment #31142003

    > Causing all extensible JSON-based protocols to eventually reinvent them: That's funny because it's true. To add to your list: JMAP ( https://jmap.io/ ) has namespaces too.

  10. comment
  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #26803764

    Quicksy.im / Conversations.im developer here. I promise I’ll never implement crypto currency into my messenger apps.¹ Even if I break my promise you could just use a fork of my app…

  13. comment
    Comment #25383259

    The existing JMAP bridge is broken. But it would cool if 'IMAP API' used JMAP instead of coming up with its own protocol. (Which covers a very similar feature set than JMAP) This w…

  14. comment
    Comment #25378663

    > If your use-case is just wanting to fetch emails from a bunch of inbox folders in real-time, potentially with some querying/filtering, Nobody says you need to implement all of JM…

  15. comment
    Comment #25336704

    https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html :)

  16. comment
    Comment #24496233

    As someone who has thought a good deal about contact discovery the mitigation techniques section is actually pretty interesting. Quicksy.im, an XMPP client but based on phone numbe…

  17. comment
    Comment #24145290

    Congratulations on acquiring the funding. > Support for encrypted two-party calls that are compatible with Conversations should be ready by the end of this year or early next year.…

  18. comment
    Comment #23995267

    Two issues here: Models like these existed. Flattr and Liberapay. The latter had to switch away from the pooling model because turns out when you do the pooling you essentially bec…

  19. comment
    Comment #23974041

    Does this mean we are only 10 years away from fusion?

  20. story
  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #22459527

    The problem JMAP is addressing is quite complex that’s why the JMAP spec is long. I do not however find it to be bloated. On the contrary I actually found it quite easy to read. (I…

  23. comment
    Comment #22413328

    I bought a T495 recently. It’s the worst ThinkPad I ever owned. (After a T60, a X301 and a X250). With modern ThinkPads you have the choice between slightly thicker notebooks T4… s…

  24. comment
  25. comment