Viewing profile — infinitesoup
infinitesoup
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 31, 2015, 5:41 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 116
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About infinitesoup
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42616267
> A youtube copyright notice / copyright strike is not the same as a DMCA takedown. Yes it is. YouTube doesn’t magically get to ignore the DMCA, so their process is built around th…
-
comment
Comment #42614603
YouTube’s “three strikes” policy is their implementation of the DMCA’s “repeat infringers” requirement: > has adopted and reasonably implemented, and informs subscribers and accoun…
-
comment
Comment #42614541
You’re conflating the two systems. YouTube does have the Content ID system, which does automatic detection and is mostly used to monetize (not take down) copyrighted content. But t…
-
comment
Comment #42614498
Sounds like he got a copyright strike, which means a DMCA takedown, not a Content ID claim. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/7002106
-
comment
Comment #42523952
> hold onto the revenue until the dispute is resolved They do that: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/7000961?hl=en
-
comment
Comment #18762749
There's a different option for if the video is public domain or otherwise not copyrightable to handle this case. I assume that that "lawyerly language" is to dissuade users from ab…
-
comment
Comment #18760573
Looking at copyright claims I have on my channel (these are valid music claims, for what it's worth), I see a dispute option labeled "The video is my original content and I own all…
-
comment
Comment #18759956
Yes, sorry, you're right -- they do it to keep the safe harbor protection (which is the only sane option when running a video sharing website).
-
comment
Comment #18759514
But YouTube does accept DMCA claims, of course, as it's required by law. Their Content ID system provides an automated way to detect potential infringement by large copyright holde…
-
comment
Comment #12689760
YouTube has an equivalent of that too: https://support.google.com/youtubegaming/answer/6304294?hl=e...
-
comment
Comment #12555068
I agree that their monetization policy is pretty vague; I wish it was clearer but they probably have to cover their bases. As for "people that abuse moderation tools for hateful or…
-
comment
Comment #12554964
There's a lot of misinformation going on in the Reddit thread. These "Heroes" get better tools for flagging videos faster (among other things), but it's still just flagging. Every …
-
comment
Comment #12493990
I found an option to turn off notifications for those messages. If you open the notification settings for a channel that you're subscribed to, you can uncheck "Include community po…
-
comment
Comment #12493954
> Censorship and demonetisation on YouTube seems to be happening to people fairly regularly, and without appeal, via poorly calibrated algorithms Demonetization happens when a vide…
-
comment
Comment #11672745
After the uploader disputes an automated claim, the claimant can uphold it as you described, but the user then has the option to appeal that claim. The only way to settle that appe…
-
comment
Comment #11672064
Flagged videos aren't removed automatically; a human reviews them first. It would probably be better if it was more automated, because humans make mistakes and machines don't get t…
-
comment
Comment #11669629
YouTube also allows users to sell or rent their videos directly through the website [0], so this doesn't seem very different to me. [0]: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3…
-
comment
Comment #11669199
Well, the law does not allow YouTube to "punish" false DMCA takedowns, so in those cases there's not much they can do. It's up to the person who had their content taken down to fil…
-
comment
Comment #11669129
I just looked on some of the claims I've gotten on my own videos, an one of the options for a dispute is "The video is my original content and I own all of the rights to it.", whic…
-
comment
Comment #11669104
That's not quite true. YouTube does have to follow the DMCA as required by law, and so they do so accordingly. They also have a separate automated system ("Content ID"), which can …
-
comment
Comment #11189702
> there is no attempt to curtail bad actors on that side of the table Do you have evidence to back that up? According to YouTube's Help Center, they do revoke Content ID access fro…
-
comment
Comment #11185755
> Content ID exists so YouTube can ease big partners. It's probably more to ease their own burden. YouTube likely receives a huge number of takedown requests daily, but with Conten…
-
comment
Comment #11185515
Or, from another perspective, Content ID is one of the best things about YouTube. Rather than all videos with copyrighted content being taken down, many get to stay up and viewable…
-
comment
Comment #11185457
How do you determine which video is the "original" version? That is, how do you tell which uploader owns the content? There isn't really a way to know until the content owner makes…
-
comment
Comment #11029654
That's not correct. Content ID is an automated takedown, but if you dispute a content ID claim, then the content owner has to respond with a DMCA takedown request if they want to c…