Viewing profile — indosauros
indosauros
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 15, 2014, 8:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 466
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About indosauros
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44371242
What's going on is "we have 14 standards so we need to create a 15th" actually worked this time
-
story
Tell HN: Microsoft.com added 192.168.1.1 to their DNS record
Is this bad? $ nslookup microsoft.com Non-authoritative answer: Name: microsoft.com Address: 192.168.1.0 Name: microsoft.com Address: 20.112.250.133 Name: microsoft.com Address: 20…
-
comment
Comment #33560856
FYI if you use Jetbrains/PyCharm, it also provides this (and has saved me many times) Just right click your file and view "Local History"
- story
-
comment
Comment #24284231
Yes, visiting the 2003 version in the Wayback Machine prompts to download a swf
-
comment
Comment #23469103
Is there a version of this that is annotated? For example a few steps in are some niches on the wall -- I half expected a popup explaining their purpose
-
comment
Comment #21593906
Here's a gif of the second issue from the blog post, just reproduced on my client https://i.imgur.com/X8FZJhi.gif
-
comment
Comment #18000619
Any course UNSW has put up by Richard Buckland https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpRRUQFbePU So much enthusiasm -- I wish I had teachers like him at school.
-
comment
Comment #17972322
I do the exact same thing. I find WIP stash-per-branch very useful when I'm context switching often between feature branches. I've got two aliases set up for this -- `git wip` and …
-
comment
Comment #17718089
It seems to me this product is mainly targeted at 1) new customers, and 2) AE Flex customers wanting to switch to Standard. The third category (Existing 2.7 Standard customers want…
-
comment
Comment #17718011
> At this time, the original App Engine-only APIs are not available in Second Generation runtimes, including Python 3.7. This means that if you already have a significant app runni…
-
comment
Comment #14720026
Discussion yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14711461
-
comment
Comment #13309150
Also soon, Python: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/
-
comment
Comment #10559588
It also matters whether you're using Python 2 or 3. This is one of the things they changed in 3: >>> print(0.1 + 0.2) 0.30000000000000004
-
comment
Comment #9907721
>>> L(*stuff, 'a', 'b') SyntaxError: only named arguments may follow *expression >>> L(*stuff, *stuff) SyntaxError: invalid syntax
-
comment
Comment #8776881
Not likely anymore: http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.h...