Viewing profile — indec
indec
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 26, 2011, 2:21 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 8
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About indec
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #3804996
My opinion is that "female-friendly fields" is (or should be) "software engineering". Thus "lets see them set up a special fund or something for female-friendly fields" reduces to …
-
comment
Comment #3669432
Well, generally following the redirects is actually somewhat redundant. The idea of GSB is that URLs that lead to bad things would all be identified and added to the database. Cust…
-
comment
Comment #3667530
We follow them on the server side and check the final URL we get to against the GSB database. We don't modify the user-generated content.
-
comment
Comment #3666976
We "unroll" redirects as much as possible so that we can check the URL at the end.
-
comment
Comment #3666917
The privacy risk for GSB in general is that you are sharing URLs with a (trusted) third party. That's most acute with the REST API, but most implementations (including gsb4ugc) cac…
-
comment
Comment #2970538
This may be just me, but I won't use GoDaddy because of their advertising. Their "sex sells" approach seems geared to re-inforce the "boys-only club" view of tech.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #2933436
Is there a good way to deal with the case of sigma = 0 (i.e. all posts have the same number of votes)?
-
comment
Comment #2930527
Was there particular value in the YC Y U NO coverage? Seems like coverage for coverage's sake. Networking value, perhaps?