Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — in-silico

in-silico

HN member
Joined
Thu, Sep 18, 2025, 12:06 AM UTC
HN karma
648
Public activity
114 items

About in-silico

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #49203456

    Does the free tier really not have access to reasoning models? That would explain a lot of the terrible AI/LLM takes online.

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #49137597

    This algorithm: sample a bunch of latents, train the model using the one with the lowest error. IWAE: sample a bunch of latents, weight the loss of training the model using each on…

  5. comment
    Comment #49137171

    The training method is very similar to Importance Weighted Autoencoders: https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.00519

  6. comment
    Comment #48999718

    Did the model really need to hack huggingface to get access to ExploitGym data? I'd imagine that once it had full internet access it could have just used the HF API or website (but…

  7. comment
    Comment #48975257

    What would evidence of "intelligence" or "creativity" look like for you?

  8. comment
    Comment #48896749

    One "solution" to these problems is to have the probes land on planets instead of asteroids, and build the necessary infrastructure there.

  9. comment
    Comment #48864551

    The difference is that artistic sensibility is largely subjective. This means that: 1. It's hard to measure (and people can disagree about it) 2. It can't really be improved using …

  10. comment
    Comment #48840625

    I feel like the data should have been generated by a much less predictable policy. It often feels like the model is ignoring my inputs and just doing what it would expect the bot t…

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #48738100

    This post misses a very important point: humans aren't 100% correct either. This means that the bar for being useful (at tasks that humans usually do) isn't perfection, it's human-…

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #48612380

    Why can't a next token predictor do math? Humans aren't calculators either, but we can do math. If you want proof just look at the benchmarks. Modern frontier models can get basica…

  15. comment
    Comment #48605735

    Additionally, maybe it's easier for a model to realize that it doesn't know the answer when the question is easier. If Opus gets all but the hardest questions right, it might have …

  16. comment
    Comment #48561772

    Neither of these strike me as particularly groundbreaking. The first idea (as I understand it as retrieving token ids rather than hidden states) is going to really struggle to do u…

  17. comment
    Comment #48558666

    > LLMs cannot do math This is plainly not true anymore

  18. comment
    Comment #48406180

    These types of ablation studies are always good. However, I'm not sure how generalizable the language model findings here are. Their 1.2B model was trained on only 10B tokens, whic…

  19. comment
    Comment #48406058

    > The problem is "public schools". The idea itself is wrong, and it can't be made to work. Do you have an alternative idea in mind?

  20. comment
    Comment #48393422

    Care to elaborate?

  21. comment
    Comment #48393319

    This is really semantics, but I wouldn't call attending to the KV cache re-reading the context. The model takes in the context, encodes it into a "memory" (the KV cache), and acces…

  22. comment
    Comment #48392516

    > It's not changed by the experience The entire file is not changed, but the KV cache is. > It doesn't remember anything The model definitely remembers previous exchanges within th…

  23. comment
    Comment #48354426

    > Would be interesting whether it is possible to write a LLM-like program just using compression and function interpolation algoritms. gzip can be used as a (not very good) LLM-lik…

  24. comment
    Comment #48311953

    We know how the models are built and trained, but we have a very limited understanding of how the final products work . That is to say, we don't know why they give the outputs that…

  25. comment
    Comment #48217917

    > But it is another good example that "AI" is just glorified search and there is not reasoning or thinking going on behind the covers A bold claim given that the current top post o…