Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ilugaslifg

ilugaslifg

HN member
Joined
Thu, Nov 17, 2016, 4:54 AM UTC
HN karma
68
Public activity
31 items

About ilugaslifg

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #14263137

    I can't believe you have the balls to write "hacker" on your profile, you fucking toad.

  3. comment
    Comment #14263118

    Yeah, sorry, I didn't at all intend that as a slight against you specifically.

  4. comment
    Comment #14263066

    Liberating proprietary software is a moral good. Full stop. The number of hopeless herbs on here who have so thoroughly internalized "legal == moral" is depressing.

  5. comment
    Comment #14262575

    Jesus christ. They successfully bought him off with $20 worth of flimsy plastic crap and company scrip. What a miserable shame.

  6. comment
    Comment #14160784

    Vancouver: where senior developers would be genuinely lucky to top out at $90k, a single bedroom on a transit line is $800k, a teardown in a distant suburb is $1.5M, and bottom she…

  7. comment
    Comment #14122722

    Short 3rd-party addendum on SA's defunct politics subforum "Laissez's Faire", the secret birthplace of many parts of internet leftist political culture. https://www.reddit.com/r/Ch…

  8. comment
    Comment #14001231

    Also, redefining "nature" to include non-physical things does not get you around the problem. We run into a language limitation, when you attempt to define away this fundamentally …

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #14001128

    An ontology is an attempt to define any divisions beyond "all of that which is". Whatever I "am", philosophically, is whatever label describes somebody who does not presume to make…

  11. comment
    Comment #14000983

    I'm just going to come out and say it. There is no good reason to believe that any ontology you can come up with to help you describe and attempt to comprehend reality, on the time…

  12. comment
    Comment #14000600

    Unless I'm missing something, you've just described "materialism", which is exactly what I am arguing for. I'm not saying that we are the only "conscious" systems, or that "conscio…

  13. comment
    Comment #13999947

    So you distinguish between dualism and the supernatural by expanding your definition of "natural" to include a distinct realm of non-material "nature" with no definable rules. And,…

  14. comment
    Comment #13999822

    How would you distinguish between "dualism" and "the supernatural"?

  15. comment
    Comment #13999542

    Even having that argument in the first place is basically crypto-dualism. The idea that there is objectively such a distinction is 100% reducible to any other attempt to assert tha…

  16. comment
    Comment #13951635

    Sure, but that's not all. Or maybe it is -- who knows. Certainly not you or I, because the only information that is public is the score and the date. The problem is the opaqueness …

  17. comment
    Comment #13951525

    Judging by the upvotes and timestamp on that story (90 points, 4 hours ago), and not being able to find it on at least the first 3 pages of HN (for comparison, there's a story on p…

  18. comment
    Comment #13910613

    Fantastic answer, thank you.

  19. comment
    Comment #13909351

    Would you mind translating this into english? Even seeing the definition of LTV above, I still don't understand the story your comment is telling. What is "paid user acquisition"? …

  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #13831034

    But a senior engineer in Vancouver makes less than a coffee-fetching intern in SF.

  22. comment
    Comment #13816519

    You're right, that is much more rightfully offensive than just the naming problem. We have a similar bit of bullshit in British Columbia, where government health insurance is paid …

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #13816210

    The term "TV License" is 1000% more offensive and outrageous, to my Canadian ears, than "TV Tax" would be. A "license" is a permit from the government to do or use something, and c…

  25. comment
    Comment #13674178

    You do not understand what a typeclass is or how it's meant to be used. If you are redundantly restating a single thing in a Haskell program, you have taken a very wrong turn. Give…