Viewing profile — iliane5
iliane5
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 02, 2022, 8:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 85
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About iliane5
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39904176
Just wanted to say thank you for your work and attention to detail, it's immensely valuable and we're all very grateful for it.
-
comment
Comment #39392563
Watching an entirely generated video of someone painting is crazy. I can't wait to play with this but I can't even imagine how expensive it must be. They're training in full resolu…
-
comment
Comment #37862166
I think it's mostly the scale. Once you have a consistent user base and tons of GPUs, batching inference/training across your cluster allows you to process requests much faster and…
-
comment
Comment #36311490
What I was saying is that because you need to go out of your way to make sure it's tokenized properly, I wouldn't be surprised if there are enough non properly tokenized examples i…
-
comment
Comment #36303927
> LLMs are not particularly good at arithmetic, counting syllables, or recognizing haikus I suspect most of this is due to tokenization making it difficult to generalize these conc…
-
comment
Comment #36158541
AFAIK it's pretty standard practice not to expose the "raw" LLM directly to the user. You need a "sanity loop" where user input and the output of the LLM is checked by another LLM …
-
comment
Comment #36104736
100% agree. However, seeing how excited Palantir is with their war assistant LLM , the US testing autonomous fighter jets a few months ago, etc. I think there's a decent chance tha…
-
comment
Comment #35981413
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #35963625
I don't think we need sentient AI for it to be autonomous. LLMs are powerful cognitive engines and weak knowledge engines. Cognition on its own does not allow them to be autonomous…
-
comment
Comment #35962286
> Why is building what amounts to a calculator/spreadsheet/CAD program for language somehow a Rubicon that cannot be crossed? We've already crossed it and I believe we should go fu…
-
comment
Comment #35962127
There's no denying this is regulatory capture by OpenAI to secure their (gigantic) bag and that the "AI will kill us all" meme is not based in reality and plays on the fact that th…
-
comment
Comment #35961948
The human brain works around a lot of limiting biological functions. The necessary architecture to fully mimic a human brain on a computer might not look anything like the actual h…
-
comment
Comment #35961691
> I don't want every to know how to make a bomb. This information is not created inside the LLMs, it's part of their training data. If someone is motivated enough, I'm sure they'd …
-
comment
Comment #35961613
> Why is it so hard to hear this perspective? Like, genuinely curious. Because people have different definition of what intelligence is. Recreating the human brain in a computer wo…
-
comment
Comment #35666019
Agreed, there is way too much hype about the actual capabilities of the LLaMa models. However, instruction tuning alone makes Alpaca much more usable than the the base model and to…
-
comment
Comment #35645928
I'm sure they're tweaking lots of things under the hood, especially now that they have 100M+ users. It could be bigger (30B?, maybe 65B) as coming down from 175B gives quite a lot …
-
comment
Comment #35642294
GPT-3.5 is much worse at "complex" cognitive tasks than Davinci (175B), which seem to indicate that it's a smaller model. It's also much faster than Davinci and costs the same as C…
-
comment
Comment #35580501
It’s not only 10x cheaper, it’s also way faster at inference and not as smart as Davinci. IMO the only logical answer is that the model is just smaller.
-
comment
Comment #35575731
I bet they’re not saying how big of a model GPT-4 is because it’s actually much smaller we would expect. ChatGPT is IMO a heavily fine-tuned Curie sized model (same price via API +…
-
comment
Comment #35476764
I think as soon as text2video gets really good (like midjourney level), there’s gonna be so much AI generated content that unless it’s all extremely good, human made content will b…
-
comment
Comment #35476724
> LLMs architected and trained the way they are now can never approach human reasoning capability Not sure if you’ve played with GPT-4 but honestly it’s getting there. If you take …
-
comment
Comment #35476612
Absolutely. What’s fascinating is that they’re getting such good understanding of many things through just text. Multimodal models that can process text, images, sounds, video, etc…
-
comment
Comment #35473369
There's no denying LLMs are anything but sentient however is sentience really needed for intelligence? I feel like if we can have machines that are X% smarter than a human could ev…
-
comment
Comment #35473255
> But it's not better than almighty human intelligence, it _is_ human intelligence, because it was trained on a mass of some of the best human intelligence in all recorded history …
-
comment
Comment #35473134
Well it's like birds and airplanes. Do airplanes "fly" in the same sense that birds do? Of course not, birds flap their wings and airplanes need to be built, fueled and flown by hu…