Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ikeboy

ikeboy

HN member
Joined
Wed, Nov 12, 2014, 5:44 AM UTC
HN karma
14,355
Public activity
4,947 items

About ikeboy

Reach me at hn@thimessolutions.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49006235

    Thomas Alan Arthur is currently serving 40 years in a US prison. He was convicted of publishing fictional text stories and two cartoon style drawings. (Note that he was accused of …

  2. comment
    Comment #48722938

    In this case the statement they checked off said that there was an unlawful reproduction of a trademark. There was no reproduction at all, since the products were originally manufa…

  3. comment
    Comment #48719194

    We got told by the 9th circuit that false claims submitted under penalty of perjury are actually just "opinions" not capable of being proven true or false. https://law.justia.com/c…

  4. comment
    Comment #48212327

    The case shouldn't have been brought, but even if brought he should have had a prompt bond hearing and been let out within 24 hours.

  5. comment
    Comment #48212085

    My concern is that new crimes will be weaponized.

  6. comment
    Comment #48211788

    In short, unlawful means different things in different contexts. In the context of false imprisonment, it generally means without legal process, and legal process later overturned …

  7. comment
    Comment #48211620

    What does that have to do with the elements of false imprisonment?

  8. comment
    Comment #48211553

    Magistrates are supposed to verify that the warrant contains probable cause and reject ones that don't. You could make the system more adversarial at that point, although I think e…

  9. comment
    Comment #48211325

    >We need to tame the impulse to throw people in jail for doing things we dislike And in comments I expanded on this and gave several specific reforms. Not sure what your understand…

  10. comment
    Comment #48211303

    Look up the elements of false imprisonment. When there's a warrant, even if wrongly granted, the arrest and imprisonment is considered lawful.

  11. comment
    Comment #48211225

    The magistrate judge should not have approved the warrant. They should have had a bail hearing within 24 hours, at which it would have been clear that they posed no threat. Instead…

  12. comment
    Comment #48210978

    The warrant here was approved by a magistrate judge, and I would suggest making the process for approval more robust to reduce this kind of abuse. Personal civil liability and firi…

  13. comment
    Comment #48210946

    As I mentioned elsewhere, neither currently apply because due process of law was followed.

  14. comment
    Comment #48210885

    I would get rid of all forms of immunity and mandate body cameras. Probably also raise requirements for police officers. And part of it is reducing the scope of what the cops are m…

  15. comment
    Comment #48210804

    If you include the guy who was arrested for posting memes as participating in a coup, sure. "But the memes were misleading" (as someone else in this thread was arguing) I don't car…

  16. comment
    Comment #48210686

    What? My original comment says that we need to reform in a different way.

  17. comment
    Comment #48210640

    I haven't said those things. Rape and murder are existing crimes, and they should be applied equally to police officers. I think that the core problem with the system is not indivi…

  18. comment
    Comment #48210366

    We should indeed get rid of many laws because the benefit is outweighed by the abuse. America has one of the highest rates of incarceration in the world (used to be #1) but suggest…

  19. comment
    Comment #48210276

    False imprisonment generally doesn't apply when due process is followed, like getting a warrant. You'd have to change the law to allow for prosecutions in cases like this, and that…

  20. comment
    Comment #48210206

    That's not at all what I said. I'm saying that for decades, people who were maliciously prosecuted by the federal government had effectively no recourse. It's good to change that, …

  21. comment
    Comment #48210165

    I doubt that. The magistrate judge already granted an unconstitutional warrant, why assume the result would be different with more info?

  22. comment
    Comment #48210148

    When an appeals court rules on one issue that's enough to decide the case, they often don't rule on the remaining issues. Anyway I don't see how you'd word a law that only applies …

  23. comment
    Comment #48210054

    Public trust should be lost, because these institutions were never trustworthy. I am not both sidesing. I'm saying that there are better reform options than adding additional crimi…

  24. comment
    Comment #48210021

    OP says that they left out information (which cops do all the time) but that the warrant shouldn't have been granted either way because of SCOTUS precedent. Would welcome reform th…

  25. comment
    Comment #48209969

    I've read the second circuit opinion and saying that it was legal is a fair takeaway. They didn't reach the 1st amendment grounds though because they didn't need to once determinin…