Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ihatemondays

ihatemondays

HN member
Joined
Tue, Aug 06, 2019, 7:54 AM UTC
HN karma
8
Public activity
18 items

About ihatemondays

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #21234557

    Obviously some people didn't understand that this policy would be included in "don't be a dick", otherwise we wouldn't be seeing all this pushback.

  2. comment
    Comment #21234058

    Relevant: https://xkcd.com/1357/ You're still perfectly "allowed" to maliciously misgender people, it'll just get you warned or banned.

  3. comment
    Comment #21234036

    If you don't take part in any conversation that requires use of third party pronouns, then this change doesn't concern you, simple as that. People are making a huge deal out of not…

  4. comment
    Comment #21233908

    StackExchange is more than StackOverflow, and StackExchange is more than just the main site. Third party pronouns are widely used in meta and chat.

  5. comment
    Comment #21233525

    And according to the SO 2019 survey, "only" 91.7% of people on SO identify as male (do keep in mind that not everyone who identifies as male uses he/him too), yet most people defau…

  6. comment
    Comment #21233482

    > Also, I wonder what happens the first time somebody says their preferred pronoun is "God", or something 127 characters long? or Little Bobby Tables? or...? As they said on the an…

  7. comment
    Comment #21233471

    The FAQ clearly states that if you don't know then you're free to use they/them, and only are required to use their preferred pronouns if you're asked to do so by the person or if …

  8. comment
    Comment #21233460

    I don't get the backlash either, I think it's a combination of genuine bigotry and the "nice" feeling of being on the side of everyone. In the end, it does feel weird to upvote a p…

  9. comment
    Comment #21233450

    So let them speak, not you. Most people I've seen that are complaining about this are from western countries.

  10. comment
    Comment #21233433

    One of the central ideas that lead SE is "Assume good intent". There's no presumption of malicious intent.

  11. comment
    Comment #21015103

    Article is from 2015, not 2018. Title is incorrect.

  12. comment
    Comment #21007523

    I've literally talked to RMS before about this. Torvalds etc might have such views too at more extreme levels, but RMS definitely has it himself.

  13. comment
    Comment #20993417

    This. And on top of all that, he quite literally voluntarily resigned, it's in the title.

  14. comment
    Comment #20993375

    ...sub-human employees? What?

  15. comment
    Comment #20993372

    > If you were both under the age of consent, as is often the case, in many jurisdictions [0], neither of you were able to give consent, and your sex act was technically non-consens…

  16. comment
    Comment #20993300

    Thanks for the tip, I will gladly lie about who I am by saying that I'm a man, so that I can receive respect for doing the same work I do now.

  17. comment
    Comment #20993295

    > It's also the reason we have an Open Source movement, that being the watered down and more corporately palatable version of Stallman's idealistic vision. If you ever talked with …

  18. comment
    Comment #20623162

    These are preventable risks. We have the technology where this would be a much less likely problem (hexacopters, octocopters, better string for the parachute etc), as many people i…