Viewing profile — ihatemondays
ihatemondays
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 06, 2019, 7:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 8
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ihatemondays
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #21234557
Obviously some people didn't understand that this policy would be included in "don't be a dick", otherwise we wouldn't be seeing all this pushback.
-
comment
Comment #21234058
Relevant: https://xkcd.com/1357/ You're still perfectly "allowed" to maliciously misgender people, it'll just get you warned or banned.
-
comment
Comment #21234036
If you don't take part in any conversation that requires use of third party pronouns, then this change doesn't concern you, simple as that. People are making a huge deal out of not…
-
comment
Comment #21233908
StackExchange is more than StackOverflow, and StackExchange is more than just the main site. Third party pronouns are widely used in meta and chat.
-
comment
Comment #21233525
And according to the SO 2019 survey, "only" 91.7% of people on SO identify as male (do keep in mind that not everyone who identifies as male uses he/him too), yet most people defau…
-
comment
Comment #21233482
> Also, I wonder what happens the first time somebody says their preferred pronoun is "God", or something 127 characters long? or Little Bobby Tables? or...? As they said on the an…
-
comment
Comment #21233471
The FAQ clearly states that if you don't know then you're free to use they/them, and only are required to use their preferred pronouns if you're asked to do so by the person or if …
-
comment
Comment #21233460
I don't get the backlash either, I think it's a combination of genuine bigotry and the "nice" feeling of being on the side of everyone. In the end, it does feel weird to upvote a p…
-
comment
Comment #21233450
So let them speak, not you. Most people I've seen that are complaining about this are from western countries.
-
comment
Comment #21233433
One of the central ideas that lead SE is "Assume good intent". There's no presumption of malicious intent.
-
comment
Comment #21015103
Article is from 2015, not 2018. Title is incorrect.
-
comment
Comment #21007523
I've literally talked to RMS before about this. Torvalds etc might have such views too at more extreme levels, but RMS definitely has it himself.
-
comment
Comment #20993417
This. And on top of all that, he quite literally voluntarily resigned, it's in the title.
-
comment
Comment #20993375
...sub-human employees? What?
-
comment
Comment #20993372
> If you were both under the age of consent, as is often the case, in many jurisdictions [0], neither of you were able to give consent, and your sex act was technically non-consens…
-
comment
Comment #20993300
Thanks for the tip, I will gladly lie about who I am by saying that I'm a man, so that I can receive respect for doing the same work I do now.
-
comment
Comment #20993295
> It's also the reason we have an Open Source movement, that being the watered down and more corporately palatable version of Stallman's idealistic vision. If you ever talked with …
-
comment
Comment #20623162
These are preventable risks. We have the technology where this would be a much less likely problem (hexacopters, octocopters, better string for the parachute etc), as many people i…