Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ignifero

ignifero

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 26, 2011, 4:26 PM UTC
HN karma
1,764
Public activity
661 items

About ignifero

This account has been banned for no apparent reason.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #2770421

    Amusingly, if you visit mercedes benz usa http://www.mbusa.com they have vic gundotra in the frontpage. Your hypothesis would be valid if facebook wasnt running an open ads platfor…

  3. comment
    Comment #2770418

    I find it disappointing that people find that reaction acceptable. Just like the fact that facebook bans Adsense ads in apps. Unless facebook can come up with an excuse such as "Yo…

  4. comment
    Comment #2769772

    4) HN doesn't make any money and is not advertised anywhere.

  5. comment
    Comment #2769646

    Interesting. Let's see how his first startup goes, and how it ends up. Remember the crunchpad? The main problem i see with him is that he's not technical. Also how popular are his …

  6. comment
    Comment #2767914

    While i can see people moving from facebook or to google+ (a lot of my friends already do), i dont know anyone who quit linkedin for g+. FB and google pretty much feed on each othe…

  7. comment
    Comment #2767875

    "With titles like these,Forbes is poised to fail."

  8. comment
    Comment #2766901

    Assuming you dont believe in mind-body duality, why would it not be representable in algorithmic form, since it can be mapped all the way down to deterministic chemical reactions?

  9. comment
    Comment #2766898

    There's a lot to be figured out before neuroscience even becomes a "proper" science, with laws and all. Even the most sophisticated methods have not been able to figure out fundame…

  10. comment
    Comment #2765562

    tl;dr ... haha not really. Google is on a roll. I both fear and love it.

  11. comment
    Comment #2765459

    But it's not like he joined the company last quarter. If the launch of g+ indicated anything, google is speeding up.

  12. comment
    Comment #2765402

    The implementation at browserid.org returns the email only . So there's no way to change the email without visiting all the sites you've registered in using browserid.

  13. comment
    Comment #2765391

    - No need to register your application with browserid.org - No need to use an oauth library (just 1 GET request) - Oauth provides access to user data on the provider, while browser…

  14. comment
    Comment #2765379

    Do an online poll and ask people "Do you know your openID" vs "Do you know your email". Users are trained to use emails for login, and that's a significant investment already.

  15. comment
    Comment #2765364

    I believe you will definately rely on one (of many possible) 3rd parties.

  16. comment
    Comment #2765359

    OTOH, facebook id != identity, neither is twitter username. There will always be some id that you won't be able to change. But you are right that email is a bad choice, and i was s…

  17. comment
  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #2765298

    They give you a token, you do a GET request to browserid.org with it and get the user's email, that's all. The user has to register their email with browserid.org first.

  20. comment
    Comment #2765283

    You can try it live at http://textchannels.com/ . I like it , it's pretty simple and neat. Easier than oauth login.

  21. comment
    Comment #2765070

    Isn't that what happens when someone compromises your email too?

  22. comment
    Comment #2764622

    This may sound embarassing, but i still get mass forwarded emails. I hope G+ will put an end to this.

  23. comment
    Comment #2764044

    This is actually a spatiotemporal cloak, not purely temporal. The probe is simply the laser (the green lines in the article picture).

  24. comment
    Comment #2763831

    I don't understand, since every single comment disagrees, why was this in the frontpage? Maybe because people like inspiring, loud words; they soothe, make you feel enlightened and…

  25. comment
    Comment #2762934

    Not really, it's not a relativistic phenomenon.