Viewing profile — idonthaveaname

> We have the power of observation - where we can plot what is safe to use recreationally... Wikipedia says this better than I can: In 2007 [Dr David] Nutt published a controversia…

The Keith Cirkel articles, mentioned earlier, are great. I also found this one, today: http://beletsky.net/2015/04/npm-for-everything.html It's less detailed, but also shorter and …

All of those problems are design issues (in the sense of overall application/site design). They can "easily" be solved by not designing the site to work that way. Sites only work t…

I had to read that twice. Nicely done!

I'd have read that but I didn't get more than two lines in before an overlay appeared in front of the content. So I gave up.

> I am just trying to ask if it is fair to punish people for bad attitude of ad networks. Publishers should ask themselves whether they are in the business of providing quality con…

The points apply equally to those things you call "applications" as they do to those things you call "sites". They're essentially the same thing. They're all functionality delivere…

> This whole progressive enhancement thing is mired in decade old dogma. While progressive enhancement can work sometimes, it is NOT the only tool. We shouldn't wholesale prescribe…

You could probably say similar for Hans Zimmer's "office"[0]. [0] http://www.stuckincustoms.com/2010/01/29/the-secret-lair-of-...

Only part of that results in lower barriers to trade. Mostly that reads like "follow these rules, update your processes and factories to these other specifications" - significant b…

I've not read the spec, and I've never written full library-type code, so feel free to vote this down. Personally, I'd say the described behaviour made sense. If I bound a function…

WebAssembly is only going to make the situation worse.

Can you prove the quote was not spin to make Google appear to have the moral high-ground here?