Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — idibidiart

idibidiart

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 4:20 PM UTC
HN karma
95
Public activity
323 items

About idibidiart

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #15989139

    Coinbase.gov

  3. comment
    Comment #15984780

    And SEC goes after shady figures, not Goldman

  4. comment
    Comment #15984776

    Coinbase.gov

  5. comment
    Comment #15984736

    Ok, look, it's a pyramid scheme no different than the stock market.... coke heads at Goldman love this sh_t

  6. story
  7. comment
    Comment #15933666

    Coinbase.Gov

  8. comment
    Comment #15926151

    "We" is "we who get others onboard"? No point in being a pessimist.

  9. comment
    Comment #15925405

    If they start losing money they will have a much stronger motivation to act. I feel like they say they are for it but they are not spending considerable resources (they should be) …

  10. comment
    Comment #15925155

    If we stage a nation-wide boycot of Amazon, Walmart.com, and a few other big retailers (and stop using Google, Bing et al) I can almost guarantee it that they will move mountains t…

  11. comment
    Comment #15903629

    The regulatory process is not scalable relative to the rate of technology driven disruption. It cannot scale. It can either fall behind or adapt to change, IMO.

  12. comment
    Comment #15902671

    I think the rate of technological change will force the SEC regulatory system to adopt an RFC process open to the public (bypassing Congress), similar to IETF, and I think Direct D…

  13. comment
    Comment #15895659

    Is this just legalized gambling?

  14. comment
    Comment #15781964

    How does the performance of WASM compare to JIT'd JS code?

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #15781881

    Any links to instructions for Reason WASM targeting?

  17. comment
    Comment #15772098

    Here to all the folks who are A) not legal scholars but pretending to be from their mom's basement and B) unable to reason about the implications but still assert their opinions, t…

  18. comment
    Comment #15772091

    Get informed. Don't talk out of your ass\: https://www.coindesk.com/eroding-net-neutrality-hurt-bitcoin...

  19. comment
    Comment #15772067

    ISPs can block all P2P traffic (bits flowing between residential IPs) and removal of Net Neutrality regulations will embolden them to do so, but it's also about the trend toward IS…

  20. comment
    Comment #15771397

    Last mile includes my last mile and your last mile and cannot see why blocking P2P traffic would not be part of the definition of last mile. Each user would be limited to a set of …

  21. comment
    Comment #15769900

    Going with your "source/destination" definition, one Bitcoin/Signal user is source and the other is destination. They can require traffic to be exclusively between user and approve…

  22. comment
    Comment #15768936

    I meant legally they can't. They'd be sued and defeated in court. But not if Net Neutrality rules are undone.

  23. comment
    Comment #15768776

    Also like I said removal of net neutrality regulations means ISPs esp big ones can kill Bitcoin by blocking the default port used by the Bitcoin client and ISPs can more than just …

  24. comment
    Comment #15768771

    Also like I said removal of net neutrality regulations means ISPs esp big ones can kill Bitcoin by blocking the default port used by the Bitcoin client and ISPs can more than just …

  25. comment
    Comment #15761618

    Amazed that no one can see that Net Neutrality going away could very well mean the death of Bitcoin. Block the port and/or type of traffic -/ or even easier: eliminate P2P: everyth…