Viewing profile — idibidiart
idibidiart
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 4:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 95
- Public activity
- 323 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About idibidiart
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38883175
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #15989139
Coinbase.gov
-
comment
Comment #15984780
And SEC goes after shady figures, not Goldman
-
comment
Comment #15984776
Coinbase.gov
-
comment
Comment #15984736
Ok, look, it's a pyramid scheme no different than the stock market.... coke heads at Goldman love this sh_t
- story
-
comment
Comment #15933666
Coinbase.Gov
-
comment
Comment #15926151
"We" is "we who get others onboard"? No point in being a pessimist.
-
comment
Comment #15925405
If they start losing money they will have a much stronger motivation to act. I feel like they say they are for it but they are not spending considerable resources (they should be) …
-
comment
Comment #15925155
If we stage a nation-wide boycot of Amazon, Walmart.com, and a few other big retailers (and stop using Google, Bing et al) I can almost guarantee it that they will move mountains t…
-
comment
Comment #15903629
The regulatory process is not scalable relative to the rate of technology driven disruption. It cannot scale. It can either fall behind or adapt to change, IMO.
-
comment
Comment #15902671
I think the rate of technological change will force the SEC regulatory system to adopt an RFC process open to the public (bypassing Congress), similar to IETF, and I think Direct D…
-
comment
Comment #15895659
Is this just legalized gambling?
-
comment
Comment #15781964
How does the performance of WASM compare to JIT'd JS code?
- story
-
comment
Comment #15781881
Any links to instructions for Reason WASM targeting?
-
comment
Comment #15772098
Here to all the folks who are A) not legal scholars but pretending to be from their mom's basement and B) unable to reason about the implications but still assert their opinions, t…
-
comment
Comment #15772091
Get informed. Don't talk out of your ass\: https://www.coindesk.com/eroding-net-neutrality-hurt-bitcoin...
-
comment
Comment #15772067
ISPs can block all P2P traffic (bits flowing between residential IPs) and removal of Net Neutrality regulations will embolden them to do so, but it's also about the trend toward IS…
-
comment
Comment #15771397
Last mile includes my last mile and your last mile and cannot see why blocking P2P traffic would not be part of the definition of last mile. Each user would be limited to a set of …
-
comment
Comment #15769900
Going with your "source/destination" definition, one Bitcoin/Signal user is source and the other is destination. They can require traffic to be exclusively between user and approve…
-
comment
Comment #15768936
I meant legally they can't. They'd be sued and defeated in court. But not if Net Neutrality rules are undone.
-
comment
Comment #15768776
Also like I said removal of net neutrality regulations means ISPs esp big ones can kill Bitcoin by blocking the default port used by the Bitcoin client and ISPs can more than just …
-
comment
Comment #15768771
Also like I said removal of net neutrality regulations means ISPs esp big ones can kill Bitcoin by blocking the default port used by the Bitcoin client and ISPs can more than just …
-
comment
Comment #15761618
Amazed that no one can see that Net Neutrality going away could very well mean the death of Bitcoin. Block the port and/or type of traffic -/ or even easier: eliminate P2P: everyth…