Viewing profile — iamnothere
iamnothere
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 13, 2015, 7:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,842
- Public activity
- 1,994 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About iamnothere
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225119
While we’re at it, let’s stop crime by adding more officers, reforming the bail system, oh and also installing cameras in everyone’s bedroom. Last resorts are last resorts because …
-
comment
Comment #49223804
I agree with you. If you look at its biggest sponsors, it’s apparent that social liberalism is an attempt to shore up the position of neoliberal capitalism by redirecting ire away …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49223704
While I do think this is a good idea, it may no longer be as good as it once was: https://journalrecord.com/2026/08/05/fbi-law-enforcement-tie... If you’re just an average dissiden…
-
comment
Comment #49223519
Seems like you’re pushing for control over user tech here over any sort of other regulation. Other regulation which would be much simpler to coordinate and which wouldn’t infringe …
-
comment
Comment #49221887
But citizens’ bodies are property of the state — there is no implied right to that repair. They may make a mistake and further damage state property. We don’t allow people to repai…
-
comment
Comment #49221856
Exactly. Rather than passing laws to require a non-digital option for these things, we should make sure that devices are locked down and controlled against users (aka hapless idiot…
-
comment
Comment #49218900
But that’s what’s happening now. The new generations in the developed world are not reproducing, so they will not have descendants. Unless something changes, the culture will be re…
-
comment
Comment #49217104
Exactly, which is why we shouldn’t be allowing user “software installs” on any device, not just phones. The world would be a lot better if all tech were fully locked down, “freedom…
-
comment
Comment #49217083
I think there’s probably others reading too.
-
comment
Comment #49216893
I know, right! Here’s hoping we have many more restrictions in the future.
-
comment
Comment #49216796
Glad you agree that it’s simply impossible to protect most people and have freedom. Hopefully we can extend this approach to other areas of life soon. “Freedom” is overrated anyway…
-
comment
Comment #49216675
You’re precisely right, and of course there’s no possible way on Earth that we could create a safe way to allow users to install apps outside of the blessed path. No matter how man…
-
comment
Comment #49216568
Obviously the solution is to restrict the stores to a small, government-licensed list of apps that are known to be safe and regulated.
-
comment
Comment #49216501
Correct. As a side benefit we can restrict users from installing applications that go against other societal interests, like apps that allow unrestricted communications. The framew…
-
comment
Comment #49216446
Exactly, and it’s impossible to regulate those business practices! Don’t even try! Better to limit what people can do on their own computing devices, or better yet remove that owne…
-
comment
Comment #49215998
Exactly, computers should only be allowed to do what expert gatekeepers deem safe. There is no possible way to allow competent users to bypass this. Even if they had to go submit a…
-
comment
Comment #49215684
But if you allow users to have freedom, grandma will get hacked! We should all be told what to do and where to go and rely on gatekeepers for permission, for safety. (And no, of co…
-
comment
Comment #49215581
A people that will not or cannot reproduce itself must eventually step aside for a people that will. Those who govern us see us as an economic zone to exploit, so perpetuating core…
-
comment
Comment #49205955
That’s typically how you show that something is vulnerable before it becomes a real problem. I mean, criticize the headline if you want, but this is pretty standard reporting for t…
-
comment
Comment #49205756
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49205690
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49203962
In Beijing robberies are 0.55 per 1,000. In Taipei it’s an unbelievable 0.0036 per 1,000, although general theft is higher at 2.12 (compared to London at 52.9). Are all these count…
-
comment
Comment #49202210
Interestingly, Tokyo has a much larger population than London with a very low crime rate. I can’t find specific numbers on stolen phones (only lost phone statistics are published) …
-
comment
Comment #49201405
Why compare demographics?