Viewing profile — i_love_limes
i_love_limes
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 10:06 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 879
- Public activity
- 75 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About i_love_limes
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48582507
This is a pretty egregious misreading of both Hardin and Ostrom, where on earth did you get this from? Hardin did not argue that private industry was more efficient. His paper desc…
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #44971495
I have to disagree with your take on "High critic score / low audience score". There is a swathe of more challenging, experimental, or art house movies that fall into this category…
- story
-
comment
Comment #43410627
The old hacker news hug of death...
-
comment
Comment #42950684
Great idea! The scrolling is a bit broken though. I can't scroll down the text on my trackpad without it going to the next article, and also it just a lot of articles with a tiny m…
-
comment
Comment #42946360
I'm having a hard time googling the book you mentioned. Is it by any chance called 'They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-45'? That's the closest thing I could find. https:…
-
comment
Comment #42867896
Well no. It's not uncommon for p-values to be even lower than that. We are talking about a specific SNP (allele) having a specific mutation being predictive of a phenotype / outcom…
-
comment
Comment #42863783
So, it is like that, but it's also not. A couple decades ago, with the advent of GWASes, because of all the multiple testing that was going on, there was an agreed new p-value thre…
-
comment
Comment #42192797
I have never heard of FireDucks! I'm curious if anyone else here has used it. Polars is nice, but it's not totally compatible. It would be interesting how much faster it is for mor…
-
comment
Comment #42058850
Other high ranking military officers that have worked closely with Trump disagree. I might be inclined to believe them over you, unless you've also worked with Trump? Or are you ju…
-
comment
Comment #41458136
I have a question that hopefully a molecular biologist can answer. Can tools like this potentially create protein structures that specifically bind in certain cells? Or is this mor…
-
comment
Comment #40490824
I suggest you read 'Study Size' under 'Methods'. Detecting an odds ratio of 1.3 with 80% power, and rounding way up to 3000 cases. To me that's not a small sample size, but definit…
-
comment
Comment #39979039
You are trying to justify one strand of unethical behaviour (how humans have bred dogs) with another. Not sure that holds up.
-
comment
Comment #39381985
For those not in Academia, it's worth noting that when you get to his level, it's more like being a VP or senior leader. Ultimately, yes you are responsible for the quality of outp…
-
comment
Comment #38793264
I ran into this too. I run a very silly slack bot for my friends, and it randomly cycles through pictures that we all have created. Initially it was completely random choice per in…
-
comment
Comment #38601029
> Best Things First. By Bjorn Lomborg Wait, this is the social scientist who wrote The Skeptical Environmentalist, whom a Danish Science committee found to be "scientifically disho…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #37855377
A lot of people... in fact a huge portion of statisticians, epidemiologists, econometrics, use it as their primary language. I do genetic epidemiology (which is considerably more c…
-
comment
Comment #36891543
In my field (genetic epidemiology), there are annoyingly un-standardised toolsets. There are libraries in R, python, and C/C++ binaries. Being able to string these together in one …
-
comment
Comment #34159966
So, this peer reviewed analysis of real data is wishful thinking science compared to your anecdotal observations? I might suggest you rethink your stance based on new information. …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #32637025
In 2015, GitHub sent me a DMCA takedown notice for a repository of dotfiles. When I tried to convince them how ridiculous that is, their only suggestion was to file a DMCA counter …
-
comment
Comment #32597973
Is this a real opinion? My god. Thinking that aborting female embryos because they will be considered less important in society is wrong, AND think that removing a women's right to…