Viewing profile — iQuercus
iQuercus
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Sep 03, 2013, 3:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 203
- Public activity
- 72 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About iQuercus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #23906270
How do I make money? - Get lucky in a Casino. How do I not lose money? - Don’t gamble. How do I not not make money? - Take more risks. A true inversion with a negative works better…
-
comment
Comment #23321724
No. No correlation.
-
comment
Comment #23052444
Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History - Good on a cloudy day Methodically Processing Systems - Good for a quirky evening (I make this one) Econtalk - Good for commuting. BBC’s In Our Time …
-
comment
Comment #22786223
At the cellular level it’s a numbers game. The more enemy combatants, the sicker you will be. The more exposure to the virus, the more viruses you’ll have in your body, the more in…
-
comment
Comment #22094777
It’s a good recipe for making a lot of estimation errors. Worse, it will leave you feeling more confident than you should be. Then, when you least expect it, it’ll blow up in your …
-
comment
Comment #22020182
This sounds more like diet marketing. People have such varying success with different diets that one set of foods simply cannot fit all. Exercise is a different story. The most lik…
-
comment
Comment #21826823
I think it’s better to know it in your bones and then go back and formalize it with theory and terminology.
-
comment
Comment #21824464
Put down the books and websites and articles. Write music.
-
comment
Comment #20556321
What does his personality have to do with what he is arguing? Is he using “bad statistical” arguments or not?
-
comment
Comment #16768432
Shameless plug, I made a short podcast episode about this, from a systems perspective. It looks at what it takes to clean your teeth...and how systems have a tendency to spiral out…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13390848
It's easy to analyze in a frictionless vacuum.
-
comment
Comment #12943620
The question is, can you effectively replace a meeting to discuss the nature of life and existence with a meeting to discuss games and movie fandoms? Or does that deeper topic inte…
-
comment
Comment #12711451
Shameless plug, since I recently wrote it: https://medium.com/the-craftsman/the-whoa-how-did-you-do-tha... Basically, don't forget the human in human computer interaction/UI/UX. It…
-
comment
Comment #12563866
I'm curious, why would you recommend Piketty's Capital for 21st Century as the one economics book?
-
comment
Comment #12304486
I have a feeling the pencil will be around after this is no more.
-
comment
Comment #12108362
Just because someone is proclaimed "expert" doesn't mean they are good at what they do. This is especially true for the softer fields that Gladwell writes in. At the end of the day…
-
comment
Comment #12068734
Think about it this way: Suppose my theory is that a fair coin is not actually fair but always lands on heads. If I flip a coin one million times and only publish the ~500,000 resu…
-
comment
Comment #12022364
This area is not exactly renowned for being a hard, mechanically measurable science, so you will get many different answers as to whether this is a problem at all or not. The wises…
-
comment
Comment #11592461
Why do you save money?
-
comment
Comment #11588291
Eli Schiff, whilst pointing out potentially valid concerns about minimalist designs, is also himself with his articles a symptom of a much larger Soviet-style centralist attitude t…
-
comment
Comment #11559638
Without trying to make any predictions, I wouldn't underestimate the human appeal of a conversational interface on the basis of its quantifiable inefficiencies. The author applies …
-
comment
Comment #11541443
Disruption as a concept seems to be a bit of an empirical controversy these days. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-05/did-clay-c...
- story
-
comment
Comment #11321585
Source?