Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — iQuercus

iQuercus

HN member
Joined
Tue, Sep 03, 2013, 3:07 PM UTC
HN karma
203
Public activity
72 items

About iQuercus

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #23906270

    How do I make money? - Get lucky in a Casino. How do I not lose money? - Don’t gamble. How do I not not make money? - Take more risks. A true inversion with a negative works better…

  2. comment
    Comment #23321724

    No. No correlation.

  3. comment
    Comment #23052444

    Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History - Good on a cloudy day Methodically Processing Systems - Good for a quirky evening (I make this one) Econtalk - Good for commuting. BBC’s In Our Time …

  4. comment
    Comment #22786223

    At the cellular level it’s a numbers game. The more enemy combatants, the sicker you will be. The more exposure to the virus, the more viruses you’ll have in your body, the more in…

  5. comment
    Comment #22094777

    It’s a good recipe for making a lot of estimation errors. Worse, it will leave you feeling more confident than you should be. Then, when you least expect it, it’ll blow up in your …

  6. comment
    Comment #22020182

    This sounds more like diet marketing. People have such varying success with different diets that one set of foods simply cannot fit all. Exercise is a different story. The most lik…

  7. comment
    Comment #21826823

    I think it’s better to know it in your bones and then go back and formalize it with theory and terminology.

  8. comment
    Comment #21824464

    Put down the books and websites and articles. Write music.

  9. comment
    Comment #20556321

    What does his personality have to do with what he is arguing? Is he using “bad statistical” arguments or not?

  10. comment
    Comment #16768432

    Shameless plug, I made a short podcast episode about this, from a systems perspective. It looks at what it takes to clean your teeth...and how systems have a tendency to spiral out…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #13390848

    It's easy to analyze in a frictionless vacuum.

  13. comment
    Comment #12943620

    The question is, can you effectively replace a meeting to discuss the nature of life and existence with a meeting to discuss games and movie fandoms? Or does that deeper topic inte…

  14. comment
    Comment #12711451

    Shameless plug, since I recently wrote it: https://medium.com/the-craftsman/the-whoa-how-did-you-do-tha... Basically, don't forget the human in human computer interaction/UI/UX. It…

  15. comment
    Comment #12563866

    I'm curious, why would you recommend Piketty's Capital for 21st Century as the one economics book?

  16. comment
    Comment #12304486

    I have a feeling the pencil will be around after this is no more.

  17. comment
    Comment #12108362

    Just because someone is proclaimed "expert" doesn't mean they are good at what they do. This is especially true for the softer fields that Gladwell writes in. At the end of the day…

  18. comment
    Comment #12068734

    Think about it this way: Suppose my theory is that a fair coin is not actually fair but always lands on heads. If I flip a coin one million times and only publish the ~500,000 resu…

  19. comment
    Comment #12022364

    This area is not exactly renowned for being a hard, mechanically measurable science, so you will get many different answers as to whether this is a problem at all or not. The wises…

  20. comment
    Comment #11592461

    Why do you save money?

  21. comment
    Comment #11588291

    Eli Schiff, whilst pointing out potentially valid concerns about minimalist designs, is also himself with his articles a symptom of a much larger Soviet-style centralist attitude t…

  22. comment
    Comment #11559638

    Without trying to make any predictions, I wouldn't underestimate the human appeal of a conversational interface on the basis of its quantifiable inefficiencies. The author applies …

  23. comment
    Comment #11541443

    Disruption as a concept seems to be a bit of an empirical controversy these days. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-05/did-clay-c...

  24. story
  25. comment