Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — hxa7241

hxa7241

HN member
Joined
Tue, Nov 25, 2008, 4:40 PM UTC
HN karma
932
Public activity
339 items

About hxa7241

random DNA unit, human, XY configuration -- http://www.hxa.name/notes/

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #32530454

    Anarchism can never even exist, let alone work, because it defines itself in a fundamentally nonsensical way. It distinguishes itself on the principle of 'non-coerciveness'. But co…

  2. comment
    Comment #30942517

    Always good to see a zero-CSS website. The true zen-master style of web production ‒ many tacitly aspire to its purity, yet few are able to shake off worldly temptations to attain …

  3. comment
    Comment #30941971

    https://www.hxa.name/ ‒ lightweight, handmade, maybe a little bit of unusualness of design, quite a few writings, some software, other oddities, and almost 20 years old.

  4. comment
    Comment #8680767

    Software is not all made up out of thin air -- you do not 'choose your own gravity'. The equivalent of phyical laws in software are computational/algorithmical, logical laws. For e…

  5. comment
    Comment #7603534

    This is, well, shallow propagandising guff. It promotes an agenda but diverts criticism with mythologising illusion. Markets fail in various ways. Should we just let that happen? -…

  6. comment
    Comment #7493896

    What is this 'theory' Naur talks of? It is not a nebulous feeling or sensation, it is something complex, articulate -- something 'built'. But how can something with logical structu…

  7. comment
    Comment #7492470

    Naur's article is based on a contradiction: On one hand, a 'theory' is described as something completely internal and irreducible: "the theory, is not, and cannot be, expressed" (q…

  8. comment
    Comment #7402359

    That argument, commonly associated with Hayek, quite trivially does not make sense. If the information is unknowable, then it cannot play any role economically. If it is unknowable…

  9. comment
    Comment #7382232

    As Landes and Posner say in 'The economic structure of intellectual property law' (Conclusion, p422, s3) (2003): "Economic analysis has come up short of providing either theoretica…

  10. comment
    Comment #7380175

    If plenty of music is being made, so what? If certain businesses cannot make so much money, tough luck on them -- they should get out of business. That is the market. The purpose o…

  11. comment
    Comment #7380158

    The copyright industry has been 'crying wolf' for ages. No-one should listen. We do not even know that very large amounts of piracy would be bad -- the market would probably reconf…

  12. comment
    Comment #7379496

    That question has been answered: we have had plenty of piracy for years now -- and do we still have plenty of film/TV/music/book production? Yes! So piracy (at least, as we have kn…

  13. comment
    Comment #6761257

    And if you like that (spheres only), you might also like this (general triangles-based), in 444 lines of Scala (and OCaml, Python, Ruby, Lua, Scheme, C++, and C): http://www.hxa.na…

  14. comment
    Comment #6579541

    This is quite pointless because it essentially cancels out. To get a cooperative structure you have to give away surplus -- that is, people with more have to give it to people with…

  15. comment
    Comment #6437608

    If they made lots of money, good: they offered a service the public wanted. As far as that basic model goes they added value into the economy. Anyone who wants to claim there is so…

  16. comment
    Comment #6194730

    > That's what's so stupid about the entire article. You could just as easily make a case that everything we have today is the result of gentlemen scientists from the renaissance Or…

  17. comment
    Comment #5655457

    Let's not confuse product with implementation. Someone still needs to choose and arrange data-structures and algorithms to fit available resources. That is engineering. Just becaus…

  18. comment
    Comment #5625849

    What precisely is wrong with people copying things for free? Since these are non-rival, non-finite goods -- that is, as many people can use or reproduce them as want to without obs…

  19. comment
    Comment #5577763

    Why? If you want to measure energy, measure energy. The point of currency is something else. Currency/money is a data-structure for a kind of cooperation algorithm . That is the wa…

  20. comment
    Comment #5350198

    What makes using an honesty-box moral? It is not that one side has dictated the terms. Imagine finding an empty car-park, parking your car, approaching the honesty-box and finding …

  21. comment
    Comment #5023762

    > people have decided that they have an intrinsic right to content They do -- people do indeed have pretty much exactly that: an intrinsic right -- to copy and share intellectual/i…

  22. comment
    Comment #4557973

    Your 'publication of ideas' argument applies only to things that can be hidden. But the patent system applies to a super-set: things that are plain, too. Therefore, by your own arg…

  23. comment
    Comment #4412389

    The program get shorter because the author learned more and improved it each time, not mainly because of the languages. Mainstream programming languages do not seem to vary much in…

  24. comment
    Comment #4368206

    While that is certainly a nice and well regarded model, it does not say much about what actually happens. It really only amounts to a proposition, and cannot be read as indicating …

  25. comment
    Comment #4347563

    Copyright is not justified by it being a way to maximise producers' revenue. Such principle would set no limit to laws that restrict people in general to make money for some few. T…