Viewing profile — huebomont
huebomont
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 12, 2018, 8:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 169
- Public activity
- 92 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About huebomont
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #23044096
The WSJ editorial board is garbage and will fall over themselves to side with corporate America even if it means making untenable arguments.
-
comment
Comment #22538348
Yep! But I don't think a ban is needed to remove cars. Just make it undesirable to have one. Remove incentives to drive. For example, removing parking (free parking especially) is …
-
comment
Comment #22538330
The data disagrees. Narrowing streets, adding vertical elements to the edges of streets, and removing lanes works. Congestion pricing helps too!
-
comment
Comment #22536735
Skip the red light camera phase and just start redesigning the streets so they don't invite speeding and dangerous driving. No amount of enforcement is ever going to stop assholes.…
-
comment
Comment #22536272
Purely subjective. I personally see no difference in the balance, and either way, "balanced" doesn't mean correct.
-
comment
Comment #22535827
It's the giant SUVs. The answer is obvious just by walking around, but the data is an obvious correlation as well. Any car that you can't see a child out of should be illegal.
-
comment
Comment #22498050
Flat, simple logo design has nothing to do with "going digital" - all the gradients and chrome shit layered on top of the existing logo are far more "digital" than anything that ca…
-
comment
Comment #22497596
I was commenting on the incredible level of jargon. This post is even more impressive!
-
comment
Comment #22497542
Lots of definitive-sounding opinions from people who clearly don't have design experience. It's fun to be equipped to see through comments that sound good but are total bullshit to…
-
comment
Comment #22497527
Thats... almost exactly what they did though.
-
comment
Comment #22497520
Hate to break it to you, but all these "problems" with the logo were exactly the same in the old logo. You got distracted by the ham-fisted layer styles and fooled into thinking th…
-
comment
Comment #22497505
This article is just a guy whining about how he personally doesn't like a logo. This logo is just fine, and it's certainly better than the old one that tried to look like it was ma…
-
comment
Comment #22494685
Love to force distracted driving!
-
comment
Comment #22469635
The solution is to stop re-writing basic browser functions. Just let me scroll.
-
comment
Comment #22469561
"good signal is inbound" - mhm yep definitely english
-
comment
Comment #22427878
It's a great idea that I'm sure some people would want. It doesn't have to be a "startup"
-
comment
Comment #22427870
exactly. not everything needs vc money.
-
comment
Comment #22427037
everything could be a small business, not everything is a startup.
-
comment
Comment #22425453
not everything is a startup
-
comment
Comment #22404976
This is some real tinfoil hat shit
-
comment
Comment #22386109
This is absolutely not the reason, they got a whiff of some anti-trust stuff and are trying to head it off.
-
comment
Comment #22379095
Fascinating, but this article needs a proofread, damn... "The virtual world on the LED screen is fantastic for many uses, but obviously an actor cannot walk through the screen, so …
-
comment
Comment #22370521
Lol he greatly expanded it, what are you talking about.
-
comment
Comment #22370507
Bernie's "independent" label means very little. Look at how he votes. He's a Democrat. It's a weird attempted knock against him considering how consistent he's always been.
-
comment
Comment #22370498
Weird definition of "choice."