Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — huebomont

huebomont

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 12, 2018, 8:56 PM UTC
HN karma
169
Public activity
92 items

About huebomont

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #23044096

    The WSJ editorial board is garbage and will fall over themselves to side with corporate America even if it means making untenable arguments.

  2. comment
    Comment #22538348

    Yep! But I don't think a ban is needed to remove cars. Just make it undesirable to have one. Remove incentives to drive. For example, removing parking (free parking especially) is …

  3. comment
    Comment #22538330

    The data disagrees. Narrowing streets, adding vertical elements to the edges of streets, and removing lanes works. Congestion pricing helps too!

  4. comment
    Comment #22536735

    Skip the red light camera phase and just start redesigning the streets so they don't invite speeding and dangerous driving. No amount of enforcement is ever going to stop assholes.…

  5. comment
    Comment #22536272

    Purely subjective. I personally see no difference in the balance, and either way, "balanced" doesn't mean correct.

  6. comment
    Comment #22535827

    It's the giant SUVs. The answer is obvious just by walking around, but the data is an obvious correlation as well. Any car that you can't see a child out of should be illegal.

  7. comment
    Comment #22498050

    Flat, simple logo design has nothing to do with "going digital" - all the gradients and chrome shit layered on top of the existing logo are far more "digital" than anything that ca…

  8. comment
    Comment #22497596

    I was commenting on the incredible level of jargon. This post is even more impressive!

  9. comment
    Comment #22497542

    Lots of definitive-sounding opinions from people who clearly don't have design experience. It's fun to be equipped to see through comments that sound good but are total bullshit to…

  10. comment
    Comment #22497527

    Thats... almost exactly what they did though.

  11. comment
    Comment #22497520

    Hate to break it to you, but all these "problems" with the logo were exactly the same in the old logo. You got distracted by the ham-fisted layer styles and fooled into thinking th…

  12. comment
    Comment #22497505

    This article is just a guy whining about how he personally doesn't like a logo. This logo is just fine, and it's certainly better than the old one that tried to look like it was ma…

  13. comment
    Comment #22494685

    Love to force distracted driving!

  14. comment
    Comment #22469635

    The solution is to stop re-writing basic browser functions. Just let me scroll.

  15. comment
    Comment #22469561

    "good signal is inbound" - mhm yep definitely english

  16. comment
    Comment #22427878

    It's a great idea that I'm sure some people would want. It doesn't have to be a "startup"

  17. comment
    Comment #22427870

    exactly. not everything needs vc money.

  18. comment
    Comment #22427037

    everything could be a small business, not everything is a startup.

  19. comment
    Comment #22425453

    not everything is a startup

  20. comment
    Comment #22404976

    This is some real tinfoil hat shit

  21. comment
    Comment #22386109

    This is absolutely not the reason, they got a whiff of some anti-trust stuff and are trying to head it off.

  22. comment
    Comment #22379095

    Fascinating, but this article needs a proofread, damn... "The virtual world on the LED screen is fantastic for many uses, but obviously an actor cannot walk through the screen, so …

  23. comment
    Comment #22370521

    Lol he greatly expanded it, what are you talking about.

  24. comment
    Comment #22370507

    Bernie's "independent" label means very little. Look at how he votes. He's a Democrat. It's a weird attempted knock against him considering how consistent he's always been.

  25. comment
    Comment #22370498

    Weird definition of "choice."