Viewing profile — howling
howling
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 22, 2015, 7:30 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 201
- Public activity
- 80 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About howling
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48890432
Andrew Kelley described Github employees as 'monkeys' and 'losers'. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46065366
-
comment
Comment #46793943
Same. I don't even use LLM normally as I found polars' syntax to be very intuitive. I just searched my ChatGPT history and the only times I used it are when I'm dealing with list a…
-
comment
Comment #46398313
Terrence Tao blogged about this. https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/08/28/dodgson-condensati...
-
comment
Comment #43203201
The paper's introduction says: we first establish algebraic product formulas for the direct computation of the Clifford product inverses of multivectors in Clifford algebras Cl(p, …
-
comment
Comment #43199983
Sorry I forgot to answer your question: To rotate a bivector of the form v ^ w, just do R v ^ R w where R is the rotation matrix. This is a linear map so you can extend the operati…
-
comment
Comment #43199826
There is no equivalent notion of rotor in EA. I would say its most important use is that you need it to define differential form in which we can define exterior derivative and inte…
-
comment
Comment #43198542
> In 2D and 3D GA, every non-zero k-vector and versor has an inverse. Of course by definition every versor has an inverse. The invertibility of k-vector gets hairier for higher dim…
-
comment
Comment #43196886
You have to read the first paragraph as well. > I have given a lot of reasons why I think GA is problematic: the Geometric Product is a bad operation for most purposes. It really i…
-
comment
Comment #43196594
> but the biggest giveaway is how he says we should move away from quaternions I'm sorry I must have missed that part. Can you point me to where did he say this?
-
comment
Comment #43196542
First of all it is only invertible for some non-zero elements, especially if `a` is a linear combination of multivectors or we work in PGA that explicitly adds a basis vector of no…
-
comment
Comment #43196461
All of these stuff can be done in normal linear algebra. Some (not all) of the operations can be done more efficiently with GA in low dimensions. It is neither more concise nor mor…
-
comment
Comment #43195061
> Can you formulate a lot of stuff much more efficiently and concisely, and does it help gain new perspective on some things? yes, absolutely. It provides a wonderful framework for…
-
comment
Comment #43193893
> Yes, sometimes you just need the dot product, and sometimes you just need the exterior product. If you are coding, or giving the final form of some formula, you don't have to alw…
-
comment
Comment #43192704
An article that argues against GA: https://alexkritchevsky.com/2024/02/28/geometric-algebra.htm... TLDR: - GA tends to attract a lot of crackpot. In fact most mathematicians avoid …
-
comment
Comment #38242064
You might be interested in https://github.com/HigherOrderCO/HVM
-
comment
Comment #37361508
I always dislike the unnecessary use of dual of dual. We should define tensor product as a quotient space of all linear combinations of v₁⊗v₂ as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Te…
-
comment
Comment #37348487
System F just isn't flexible enough to encode most of mathematics. You need at the minimum dependent type and preferably a more flexible identity type to avoid setoid hell. The clo…
-
comment
Comment #36113435
Symmetric interaction combinators (an instance of interaction nets like 2-state 3-symbol Turing machine is a particular type of Turing Machine) only has 3 agents and 3 rewriting ru…
-
comment
Comment #36112160
I think interaction nets [0] is actually a simpler model and can simulate Turing Machine efficiently. I wish courses in Computability/Complexity theory would be taught in interacti…
-
comment
Comment #35231937
This is the same company that creates the touted highly secure LiteLok Gold that LPL cuts in 16s. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-On0DGcDlc I'm skeptical of any bike lock's secur…
-
comment
Comment #35035080
None, but I have written code that requires more data structure and algorithm knowledge than inverting a binary tree (at my job).
-
comment
Comment #35032133
Yeah it's not clear what he was asked. Swapping the direction of every edge of a binary tree would result in a DAG that is likely no longer a binary tree though.
-
comment
Comment #35031838
> Google: 90% of our engineers use the software you wrote (Homebrew), but you can’t invert a binary tree on a whiteboard so fuck off. — Max Howell (@mxcl) If inverting a binary tre…
-
comment
Comment #34545109
I have a similar experience at Oxford. However, the introduction course doesn't even cover IO monad and all of our code are run in repl. No wonder the students regard Haskell as im…
-
comment
Comment #34426976
nuclear fusion reaction with net energy gain?