Viewing profile — hobscoop
hobscoop
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 15, 2017, 5:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 145
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hobscoop
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47126778
Do you have the manual? It might be possible to configure a non-beeping mode. (I recently learned this was the case with my Panasonic model, to great delight.)
-
comment
Comment #43200496
This cannot work: the power balance doesn't close for a 25 MWe tokamak. Otherwise people would have made plans to build one already. Tokamaks want to be big for physics reasons, wa…
-
comment
Comment #41399757
Rubi is great. When I'm stuck on an integral in Mathematica with the builtin Integrate, I load up Rubi and sometimes it can find a solution.
-
comment
Comment #40997986
Are they able to adjust the color and brightness simultaneously? Or would brightness be controlled with PWM?
-
comment
Comment #40878468
Strong echoes of the Onion's reporting on Dr. Lester Mordock's giant crabs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Uq9pp586AE
-
comment
Comment #40464793
This would eliminate the failure mode of my grayscale attempts. I would appreciate knowing the configuration steps.
-
comment
Comment #39275757
Plasma physicist here. While this is an idea worthy of study, the answer to the (spaceweatherarchive.com) title question is "no". The researcher's article makes simple errors in wh…
-
comment
Comment #32208473
Actually, I think the strength of modern steels is a limiting factor for fusion magnets. Plasma "beta"s are only a few %, so for a few atmospheres of plasma pressure your magnetic …
-
comment
Comment #32208458
I thought they were ultimately limited by problems of corrosion at the electrodes? Helion's scheme to turn fusion heat into pushing E&M fields back through their magnet to generate…
-
comment
Comment #32208432
Yes. We're currently living through a golden age of stellarator design powered by new algorithms and optimization techniques.
-
comment
Comment #32208426
It'll ultimately be dissipated by infrared radiation into space. Earth receives something like 173,000 terawatts of radiation from the sun; this is equal to the amount radiated out…
-
comment
Comment #31032063
It sounds like they're trying to build a device with a distribution of ions in velocity space which is very far from the equilibrium Gaussian-type distribution ('Maxwellian'). This…
-
comment
Comment #29126944
It's pretty different. This is pulsed; LM's was going to be steady state. LM's design had magnets internal to the plasma which has significant difficulties. The proposed fuels are …
-
comment
Comment #29126934
For a long time fusion was funding constrained: there were many more ideas than could be tested and examined under government budgets. In the US nearly all funding went to one conc…
-
comment
Comment #29124090
It's not plausible that even fusion power plants would make energy 'basically free'. 1) Fusion plants still require site infrastructure, power conversion technology, waste heat rem…
-
comment
Comment #29123985
There are more plausible and less plausible concepts/companies out there. Helion in particular was founded by respectable scientists who have a background in plasma physics, and th…
-
comment
Comment #29123934
There's some interesting arguments in favor of the combination of magnetic and interial approaches. This is broadly known as 'magneto-inertial fusion', and there's a continuum of i…
-
comment
Comment #29121067
SPARC is very important, but it's a physics demonstration facility, not a reactor. Its not going to generate any electricity. CFS (SPARC's parent company) will use SPARC to demonst…
-
comment
Comment #29120913
Helion's scheme would require a specific isotope of helium, of which there's not much of in current stockpiles. Assuming that you had some He-3, remember that since this is a react…
-
comment
Comment #28778402
No currently operating device is 'attempting' to achieve Q_total; they are all physics experiments, not simply searching for a magic combination of knobs that will ignite the plasm…
-
comment
Comment #28778288
SPARC is aiming for Q_plasma of about 10 in 2025, but not to generate energy at all: it doesn't have any of the required 'blanket' system for breeding tritium. SPARC is a physics t…
-
comment
Comment #28136658
If only the US Forest Service knew about this, they could have properly answered Rep Louie Gohmert's questions!
-
comment
Comment #26893556
ITER is planning to do its flagship D+T runs in 2035, not 2050. While inertial confinement fusion facilities like NIF are also used for weapons work, the physics of magnetic confin…
-
comment
Comment #26890517
I don't understand the promise of lattice confinement fusion. While it is certain believable that they measured fusion events, the explanation they give involves several unlikely s…
-
comment
Comment #24599563
Try H3 mining of Uranus or Neptune rather than Jupiter! The gravity well is much smaller.