Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — hgs3

hgs3

HN member
Joined
Tue, Aug 11, 2020, 5:44 AM UTC
HN karma
1,482
Public activity
647 items

About hgs3

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48888723

    Can we also flag AI generated projects posted on Show HN? I used to love reading HN for the handwritten articles and handmade projects, but in the LLM era the quality has deteriora…

  2. comment
    Comment #48388015

    > what’s left to get to is relatively small Not necessarily. In many (most?) areas of tech the rate of advancement follows a logarithmic curve. That is to say, the first 90% is ach…

  3. comment
    Comment #48267738

    I blocked AI overview because it starves websites of their own traffic and revenue. Websites accepted Google scraping their content because it gave them a prominent blue link plus …

  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #48263454

    Not sure if you're aware, but defer is proposed for C2Y [1]. It's already available in Clang behind a compiler flag. It is interesting how the languages continue to diverge. [1] ht…

  6. comment
  7. comment
  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #48228503

    I think there is one major difference that separates the two eras: in ye olden days you bought software for a fixed price and while it's understood you might only receive updates f…

  10. comment
    Comment #48227630

    Data is being licensed by AI companies, but negotiations are limited to those with the capital [1][2][3]. You write about "imbalance" but ignore that large firms can cut deals whil…

  11. comment
    Comment #48226424

    > concrete steps Start by legally compelling companies that trained on unlicensed data to either (1) license the data, (2) publish their model, or (3) destroy their model.

  12. comment
    Comment #48226223

    If models are trained on the collective whole, they must be owned by the collective whole. If you believe funding creators for the training of private models is too slow, inconveni…

  13. comment
    Comment #48224901

    How about forcing businesses to be owned by their employees [1]? Instead of taxing the owning class and being paid UBI peanuts, you become the owning class and reap the rewards dir…

  14. comment
    Comment #48224734

    How about requiring AI companies to pay creators for training rights? Alternatively, models trained on the commons must be owned by the commons. Right now these AI companies are tr…

  15. comment
    Comment #47055228

    > In my opinion, for open-source projects, scoring the project's AI sloppiness based on the timeline of commits would be a good indicator. You can’t necessarily judge by timeline. …

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #46936947

    Great read. It would be neat to see a mini operating system under 1 kb of code.

  18. comment
    Comment #46936841

    > We're on the precipice of something incredible. Only if our socioeconomic model changes.

  19. comment
    Comment #46934562

    Why is slop assumed inevitable? These models are plagiarization and copyright laundering machines. We need a great AI model reset whereby all published works are assumed to opt-out…

  20. comment
    Comment #46934482

    > It's called Universal Basic Income. I'd rather we democratize ownership [1]. Instead of taxing the owning class and being paid UBI peanuts, how about becoming the owning class an…

  21. comment
    Comment #46905790

    > As far as I know, there aren't any Rust based C compilers with the same capabilities. If you trained on a neutral representation like an AST or IR, then the source language shoul…

  22. comment
    Comment #46866389

    I miss the Bill Gates and Steve Jobs days. At least there were positive improvements to Windows and Mac in those days.

  23. comment
    Comment #46851162

    > reflects the software engineering philosophies of the 1980s. It has a microkernel architecture. That's already an improvement over the "modern" monolithic kernels we are stuck wi…

  24. comment
    Comment #46843930

    > Apple being the largest sponsor of Objective-C would suggest that you get greater vendor lock-in out of it than Swift Fun fact, you can use Objective-C on non-Apple platforms [1]…

  25. comment
    Comment #46843901

    Why is there no C benchmark? The C++ benchmark appears to be "modern C++" which isn't a substitute.