Viewing profile — hgs3
hgs3
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 11, 2020, 5:44 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,482
- Public activity
- 647 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hgs3
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48888723
Can we also flag AI generated projects posted on Show HN? I used to love reading HN for the handwritten articles and handmade projects, but in the LLM era the quality has deteriora…
-
comment
Comment #48388015
> what’s left to get to is relatively small Not necessarily. In many (most?) areas of tech the rate of advancement follows a logarithmic curve. That is to say, the first 90% is ach…
-
comment
Comment #48267738
I blocked AI overview because it starves websites of their own traffic and revenue. Websites accepted Google scraping their content because it gave them a prominent blue link plus …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48263454
Not sure if you're aware, but defer is proposed for C2Y [1]. It's already available in Clang behind a compiler flag. It is interesting how the languages continue to diverge. [1] ht…
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48228503
I think there is one major difference that separates the two eras: in ye olden days you bought software for a fixed price and while it's understood you might only receive updates f…
-
comment
Comment #48227630
Data is being licensed by AI companies, but negotiations are limited to those with the capital [1][2][3]. You write about "imbalance" but ignore that large firms can cut deals whil…
-
comment
Comment #48226424
> concrete steps Start by legally compelling companies that trained on unlicensed data to either (1) license the data, (2) publish their model, or (3) destroy their model.
-
comment
Comment #48226223
If models are trained on the collective whole, they must be owned by the collective whole. If you believe funding creators for the training of private models is too slow, inconveni…
-
comment
Comment #48224901
How about forcing businesses to be owned by their employees [1]? Instead of taxing the owning class and being paid UBI peanuts, you become the owning class and reap the rewards dir…
-
comment
Comment #48224734
How about requiring AI companies to pay creators for training rights? Alternatively, models trained on the commons must be owned by the commons. Right now these AI companies are tr…
-
comment
Comment #47055228
> In my opinion, for open-source projects, scoring the project's AI sloppiness based on the timeline of commits would be a good indicator. You can’t necessarily judge by timeline. …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46936947
Great read. It would be neat to see a mini operating system under 1 kb of code.
-
comment
Comment #46936841
> We're on the precipice of something incredible. Only if our socioeconomic model changes.
-
comment
Comment #46934562
Why is slop assumed inevitable? These models are plagiarization and copyright laundering machines. We need a great AI model reset whereby all published works are assumed to opt-out…
-
comment
Comment #46934482
> It's called Universal Basic Income. I'd rather we democratize ownership [1]. Instead of taxing the owning class and being paid UBI peanuts, how about becoming the owning class an…
-
comment
Comment #46905790
> As far as I know, there aren't any Rust based C compilers with the same capabilities. If you trained on a neutral representation like an AST or IR, then the source language shoul…
-
comment
Comment #46866389
I miss the Bill Gates and Steve Jobs days. At least there were positive improvements to Windows and Mac in those days.
-
comment
Comment #46851162
> reflects the software engineering philosophies of the 1980s. It has a microkernel architecture. That's already an improvement over the "modern" monolithic kernels we are stuck wi…
-
comment
Comment #46843930
> Apple being the largest sponsor of Objective-C would suggest that you get greater vendor lock-in out of it than Swift Fun fact, you can use Objective-C on non-Apple platforms [1]…
-
comment
Comment #46843901
Why is there no C benchmark? The C++ benchmark appears to be "modern C++" which isn't a substitute.