Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — hellfish

hellfish

HN member
Joined
Fri, Nov 18, 2022, 7:02 PM UTC
HN karma
69
Public activity
65 items

About hellfish

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #34446063

    fd takes less time, would recommend

  2. comment
    Comment #34243231

    Why are people here saying things like "everyone will use chatgpt"? How do we know that this isn't a fad? Chatgpt gives us answers, but so do the top linked articles in a search en…

  3. comment
    Comment #34241983

    Damn... where else will I find quality nugget pron? Fuck you Louisiana gov

  4. comment
    Comment #34131992

    [flagged]

  5. comment
    Comment #34131948

    Good idea, it's high time this practice gets banned

  6. comment
    Comment #34131903

    > I mean we allowed the alphabet agencies to cooperate with social media companies to fight "ISIS propaganda." -- what did you think would happen? I remember thinking earlier, it's…

  7. comment
    Comment #34131817

    > Thinking that you can be a free-from-all libertarian is like being a house cat that does not comprehend the system that keeps him alive. So because the government does something …

  8. comment
    Comment #34131720

    This whole issue revolves around how comfortable people are with DC sticking its nose in social media These agencies have already seen massive scope creep in the past couple decade…

  9. comment
    Comment #34110776

    > It does not take a genius to figure out that expensive end of life care paid with taxpayer funds and the country’s labor resources could instead be going towards things like educ…

  10. comment
    Comment #34058490

    I wonder if there's a way to exploit this to get free music out of apple...

  11. comment
    Comment #34043415

    > but they seem to have omitted the most important category: class bias. Likely because the list itself is the product of class bias "White space" is offensive but "white trash" is…

  12. comment
    Comment #33806197

    > What worries me is that the US itself will go in the same direction. The surveillance is already there, but it is not acted on for the most part in everyday life. But there may b…

  13. comment
    Comment #33806037

    > Should I not have the freedom to organize a protest of my local theater for hosting a controversial figure that I think is worthy of cancellation? Isn't that a very basic and fun…

  14. comment
    Comment #33790688

    > I think this is hard wired to us. We want to be told what reality is by people or groups with clout, people who are cool and have prestige, and we're hard-wired to just believe i…

  15. comment
    Comment #33790520

    > I think we’ve evolved from that to “being gaslit is the wallpaper for most conversations. No, not really. Unless you're surrounded by bad people

  16. comment
  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #33780496

    > Perhaps recognizing the existing power dynamics? by "power dynamics", do you mean lies propagated by the CCP? > Perhaps playing the game over a longer time frame? Apple isn't a g…

  19. comment
    Comment #33780311

    I'm sick to death of seeing these corporations pretending to care about human rights, then doing stuff like this Or pretending to care about the environment, then forcing people to…

  20. comment
    Comment #33780077

    > I assume this is about Foxconn. Does that mean you'll be boycotting other companies that also work with them, like Amazon, Dell, Google, HP, Intel, Microsoft, Vizio, Acer, Lenovo…

  21. comment
    Comment #33776473

    > " ... is often called the stack." What's wrong about the stack part? It seemed a little odd (and unnecessarily abstract) that the author said "automatic storage" instead of just …

  22. comment
    Comment #33775218

    > Implying that the American lockdown is the same as the Chinese one Wasn't what was said in my comment. It was about protests of the lockdowns and the govt/media response to said …

  23. comment
  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #33765216

    > you said you won't listen to anything anyone says wasn't the intended meaning