Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — helicalmix

helicalmix

HN member
Joined
Sat, Dec 10, 2022, 1:53 AM UTC
HN karma
119
Public activity
42 items

About helicalmix

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45906107

    I think it's totally fair to be skeptical, but it's also not rare to have interventions that are astoundingly effective. Antibiotics and vaccines may not be completely free lunches…

  2. comment
    Comment #44647022

    The transformer paper was published in 2017, and within 8 years (less so, if i'm being honest), we have bots that passed the Turing test. To people with shorter term memories, pass…

  3. comment
    Comment #44598199

    > So healthier customers means their profit is 5% of SMALLER_NUMBER. I don't think this is completely true right? Rather, it's more accurate to say that customers that are seen as …

  4. comment
    Comment #44560866

    can you explain this statement to me more? I think i'm missing something

  5. comment
    Comment #44553066

    hmm...doesn't this possibly incentivize ozempic subsidies even more? If you know a "customer" of yours (an individual employee) is only going to be with you until they either chang…

  6. comment
    Comment #43427168

    this is not intuitive to me. In your description, it feels like capital more closely resembles carrots then whips? also, the person's only source of wages isn't going to be specifi…

  7. comment
    Comment #40998982

    https://www.nycp.com/elements/HA1/1345 Basically, in business and life, if you're too in love with craftsmanship of a specific function, but can't relate that well to the general g…

  8. comment
    Comment #40351341

    hm, maybe we're misinterpreting each other's main point. My reply was to some person who said that AI was akin to astrology, i.e. absolutely fake bullshit, which is bonkers to me. …

  9. comment
    Comment #40349226

    sorry, maybe i'm not completely understanding what you mean by "in consumer products". reading your argument on reddit, it seems to me that you don't consider 3d printing a success…

  10. comment
    Comment #40348527

    > It may feel like a normal conversation but is a Chinese Room on steroids. Can you prove that humans are not chinese rooms on steroids themselves?

  11. comment
    Comment #40348453

    > Sure, 3d printing has its place (mostly in making plastic parts for things) but it's hardly the revolutionary change in consumer products that it was touted to be. Instead, it's …

  12. comment
    Comment #40348380

    i feel like a common consumer fallacy is that, because you don't interact with a technology in your day-to-day life, it leads you to conclude that the technology is useless. I guar…

  13. comment
    Comment #40348324

    which hype cycles are you referring to? and, after the dust settled, do you conclusively believe nothing of value was generated from these hype cycles?

  14. comment
    Comment #40348304

    sure, but we're not discussing the outsourcing of human companionship in this context. we're discussing the capabilities of current technology.

  15. comment
    Comment #40348290

    this is a different thesis than "AI is basically bullshit astrology", so i'm not disagreeing with you. Understanding atomic energy gave us both emission-free energy and the atomic,…

  16. comment
    Comment #40348220

    > GPT-4o being able to describe actual events in real time is interesting, it's yet to be seen if that's useful. sure, but my experience is that if you are able to optimize better …

  17. comment
    Comment #40347571

    i legitimately don't understand this viewpoint. 3 years ago, if you told me you could facetime with a robot, and they could describe the environment and have a "normal" conversatio…

  18. comment
    Comment #39119836

    This feels like an uncreative statement though, as there are many different ways to use this data. For example, what if an engineering manager needs to convince finance for headcou…

  19. comment
    Comment #39110636

    This is a silly example, because Ilya's umbrella isn't front-end code. To answer your question though, yes, if Ilya was Head of UX Engineering and his front-end code wasn't up to p…

  20. comment
    Comment #38974688

    My tongue in cheek response is that you are correct, because a century ago, WWII didn't happen yet. Can you provably demonstrate that education quality was better a century ago? I'…

  21. comment
    Comment #38972989

    Have you considered that it's possible that both you and Scott are particular good at reasoning, and it's everyone else that is much worse at this stuff? You're pointing out a bunc…

  22. comment
    Comment #38970956

    Haha yeah, I've been to rationalist meetups too, and have come to the same conclusion that I don't like them very much. Too much IQ stroking for my tastes. Scott specifically thoug…

  23. comment
    Comment #38970754

    Oh, that's a good point, and I think you're idea is a better behavior model vs. the "stick with prior" idea. What if the conclusion forces behavior though? For voting, you can abst…

  24. comment
    Comment #38970449

    > This is the correct Bayesian action: if I know that a false argument sounds just as convincing as a true argument, argument convincingness provides no evidence either way. I shou…

  25. comment
    Comment #38970392

    One counterexample for why I think it's not always the best approach is that there are sometimes disproportionate rewards for being right when everyone else is wrong. Doing so, how…