Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — hcks

hcks

HN member
Joined
Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 6:42 PM UTC
HN karma
853
Public activity
440 items

About hcks

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48319782

    PSA: not making safe environments where you can skip all permissions and instead wasting time monitoring agents == incompetence

  2. comment
    Comment #46405082

    Guy who made millions selling ads has a meltdown over one (1) spam email

  3. comment
    Comment #42791483

    I know!! Also we could have given an IPhone to 500 million of people for the amount!! It’s such a waste to think they’re investing it in the future instead

  4. comment
    Comment #42790143

    At this point why not go low-tech and use healing crystals?

  5. story
  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #41990312

    Well either volume weighted or randomised then

  8. comment
    Comment #41837467

    [flagged]

  9. comment
    Comment #41776792

    Could you please list say the top 5 Nobel worthy achievements of this backlog

  10. comment
    Comment #41748986

    You're right, Meta shouldn't invest in a breakthrough technology. They should focus on what really matters: delivering short term value to shareholders

  11. comment
    Comment #41745194

    Round of applause for this useless unsubstantiated comment

  12. comment
    Comment #41701895

    This outrage talk is ridiculous, you don’t have the morale high ground to judge people, they didn’t break anything, taking VC money isn’t bad, the incident was caused by sore loser…

  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #41685362

    [flagged]

  15. comment
    Comment #41685342

    This is actually an incredibly stupid thing to say which reflects poorly on NASA management

  16. comment
    Comment #41672766

    Hackernews when we may be on the path of actual AI "meh I hate this, you know what’s actually really interesting? Manually writing tests for software"

  17. comment
    Comment #41672719

    And by nowadays you mean since ChatGPT got released, that is less than 2 years ago (e.g. a consumer preview of a frontier research project). Interesting.

  18. comment
    Comment #41617020

    [flagged]

  19. comment
    Comment #41583709

    Okay but how big of a sample size do we even actually need for word frequencies? Like what’s the goal here? It looks like the initial project isn’t even stratified per year/decade

  20. comment
    Comment #41546887

    > I recently built a Brainfuck compiler and TUI debugger Highly representative of what devs make all day indeed

  21. comment
    Comment #41546852

    > HN on LLMs "meh not real reasoning, in fact it's exactly the same thing as ELIZA" > HN when someone makes a trivial LLM-wrapper (but cynic!! I hate corporate ahah): 9999 comments…

  22. comment
    Comment #41546771

    > The young ones don't understand why we oldies roll our eyes at hearing the 13th iteration of "this is ground breaking new idea" Why not constructively contribute by explaining wh…

  23. comment
    Comment #41068258

    Yes software dev has 10 good years left

  24. comment
    Comment #41057300

    “We thought academia was not soul crushing enough so from now on you will additionally spend 10 hours a week replicating dumb papers from 1993”

  25. comment
    Comment #41057093

    The introductory example is quite illuminating. No theory behind, just a random hypothesis tested (by comparing the preferences of 10 fishes from populations separated from as litt…