Viewing profile — hcks
hcks
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 6:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 853
- Public activity
- 440 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hcks
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48319782
PSA: not making safe environments where you can skip all permissions and instead wasting time monitoring agents == incompetence
-
comment
Comment #46405082
Guy who made millions selling ads has a meltdown over one (1) spam email
-
comment
Comment #42791483
I know!! Also we could have given an IPhone to 500 million of people for the amount!! It’s such a waste to think they’re investing it in the future instead
-
comment
Comment #42790143
At this point why not go low-tech and use healing crystals?
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #41990312
Well either volume weighted or randomised then
-
comment
Comment #41837467
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #41776792
Could you please list say the top 5 Nobel worthy achievements of this backlog
-
comment
Comment #41748986
You're right, Meta shouldn't invest in a breakthrough technology. They should focus on what really matters: delivering short term value to shareholders
-
comment
Comment #41745194
Round of applause for this useless unsubstantiated comment
-
comment
Comment #41701895
This outrage talk is ridiculous, you don’t have the morale high ground to judge people, they didn’t break anything, taking VC money isn’t bad, the incident was caused by sore loser…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #41685362
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #41685342
This is actually an incredibly stupid thing to say which reflects poorly on NASA management
-
comment
Comment #41672766
Hackernews when we may be on the path of actual AI "meh I hate this, you know what’s actually really interesting? Manually writing tests for software"
-
comment
Comment #41672719
And by nowadays you mean since ChatGPT got released, that is less than 2 years ago (e.g. a consumer preview of a frontier research project). Interesting.
-
comment
Comment #41617020
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #41583709
Okay but how big of a sample size do we even actually need for word frequencies? Like what’s the goal here? It looks like the initial project isn’t even stratified per year/decade
-
comment
Comment #41546887
> I recently built a Brainfuck compiler and TUI debugger Highly representative of what devs make all day indeed
-
comment
Comment #41546852
> HN on LLMs "meh not real reasoning, in fact it's exactly the same thing as ELIZA" > HN when someone makes a trivial LLM-wrapper (but cynic!! I hate corporate ahah): 9999 comments…
-
comment
Comment #41546771
> The young ones don't understand why we oldies roll our eyes at hearing the 13th iteration of "this is ground breaking new idea" Why not constructively contribute by explaining wh…
-
comment
Comment #41068258
Yes software dev has 10 good years left
-
comment
Comment #41057300
“We thought academia was not soul crushing enough so from now on you will additionally spend 10 hours a week replicating dumb papers from 1993”
-
comment
Comment #41057093
The introductory example is quite illuminating. No theory behind, just a random hypothesis tested (by comparing the preferences of 10 fishes from populations separated from as litt…