Viewing profile — hashtagmarkup
hashtagmarkup
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 25, 2020, 1:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -14
- Public activity
- 156 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hashtagmarkup
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25175550
You ain't bright. If you pee in a cup of someone else's pee, you destroyed evidence. That is what publishing DKIM keys would do. A flood of fake messages to taint and destroy the a…
-
comment
Comment #25157814
After 5 replies, there isn't much room for logic. Trolls gonna troll... you should consider that. I can help. Fly out, I got a guest room. I guarantee you won't regret it.
-
comment
Comment #25157745
I wouldn't want to be a part of anything that denied the truth in favor of civility. Dang, I thought you would have understood that.
-
comment
Comment #25157729
What do you call it when someone pees into someone else's pee sample?
-
comment
Comment #25157526
LOL! You believe in justice. Learn how the real world works, muggle.
-
comment
Comment #25157492
LOL. denial is real. HN is dead. A bunch of VC stroking trumpers. #pathetic
-
comment
Comment #25156618
Heavy handed moderators are obviously to blame.
-
comment
Comment #25156153
Still ignorant and wrong tho...
-
comment
Comment #25154098
You're absolutely right... the other person was ignorant and wrong.
-
comment
Comment #25149532
THE PEOPLE WHO RELEASED THE DKIM KEYS WOULD BE GUILTY, YOU COMPLETE DOLT. I didn't claim a crime was committed... you did, you complete dolt. Evidence doesn't imply a crime... you …
-
comment
Comment #25133743
A victim used to be able to prove they didn't send a message. A leaker used to be able to prove someone did send a message. Those evidentiary options no longer exist. They were des…
-
comment
Comment #25118728
I'm not the person who said outting people as gay was productive. The other person claimed it could be destructive.
-
comment
Comment #25118713
No one is auto-disappearing messages. You are just not understanding. Evidence that used to exist no longer exists as hard evidence. It isn't "hidden"... everything is still there.…
-
comment
Comment #25116003
Because the DKIM keys were not made public, and a message sent from their account could be confirmed to be authentic. If the keys were public, they could claim forgery. Regardless …
-
comment
Comment #25115985
It doesn't at all. You're misunderstanding. Or, are you using the word "literally" in the modern sense of "not literally"?
-
comment
Comment #25115573
By making the DKIM keys public, you are converting solid evidence of something that was said into something that was either really said, or someone else pretended that they said. E…
-
comment
Comment #25115512
As a hand-waving technical pedantic, you are literally correct. But, "literally" actually has a specific meaning in english, and it's not always to be literal .
-
comment
Comment #25115419
> Being gay is not a crime, and yet people can be blackmailed with it. It is very easy to open yourself up to blackmail by perfectly legitimate activities. Option 1: DKIM keys stay…
-
comment
Comment #25115324
You're misunderstanding how destruction of evidence works.
-
comment
Comment #25115213
Yes. We are saying the same thing.
-
comment
Comment #25114165
> The threat is not limited to politicians. Anyone (including you and your family members) could be blackmailed or otherwise publicly embarrassed. ... for what they actually did. Y…
-
comment
Comment #25113794
Except your "backyard shed" is actually an uncountable number of your cells that are "edited" (changed using the reprogramming abilities inherent to mRNA, but god forbid you refer …
-
comment
Comment #25111751
This isn't about funding... this is about taking a giant leap into mRNA vaccines, that until now have not been approved for human use. We aren't injecting processed proteins into o…
-
comment
Comment #25105996
They screwed up by putting themselves in this position where their only hope for a future is desperately trying to distance themselves from what they've done and who they are.
-
comment
Comment #25095814
Do you know what "reflection" means? You're not making any sense.