Viewing profile — hapiri
hapiri
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 14, 2022, 11:01 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 56
- Public activity
- 34 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hapiri
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #32603441
iirc online identity used to be tied to your public key signature ? Might be too technical for most population to use, but the ideal solution is already there I think ?
-
comment
Comment #31884612
The saving habits was mainly of the post-WW2 generations that have to follow a prudent life style to survive. Highly doubt that Confucius has anything to do with this.
-
comment
Comment #31836977
I found the article quite weird for some of the points. But following the optimism spirit, first are things that I found optimistic: >Child mortality, childbirth death decrease >Ch…
-
comment
Comment #31724840
Well this would not do the shattering-ago amount of damage but after repeated exposure I would probably get burnt out and quit. Here is an anecdotal analogy: Friends repeatedly cal…
-
comment
Comment #31724836
Well this would not do the shattering-ago amount of damage but after repeated exposure I would probably get burnt out and quit. Here is an anecdotal analogy: Friends repeatedly cal…
-
comment
Comment #31721139
But that would be a loss to community, and we would not want Foone to goes full offline won't we ?
-
comment
Comment #31713058
Is it what your user wishes or what you wish your user to see.
-
comment
Comment #31670228
When I read "fatal" I don't imagine the "death" but more "inevitable".
-
comment
Comment #31663642
Higher level protocol would establish handshake & encryption I imagine.
-
comment
Comment #31663625
I have concerns about ultrasonic pollution if this is widely adopted.
-
comment
Comment #31657605
It is less secure than your standard symmetric encryption. I guess they would use deterministic encryption in which 2 entries with same email address will have the same record stri…
-
comment
Comment #31650437
Mandated paternity leaves is to provide an equal part contributions towards children for both the mother and the father. Otherwise the mother take most of the hit ( as evidence in …
-
comment
Comment #31577427
Why not just sell the company's stock like the legacy way ? I suspect some legal loophole here.
-
comment
Comment #31558052
"beliefs" here is a sarcastic term but of course they refers to the written legal contracts.
-
comment
Comment #31549858
I notice there seems to be a "No true Scottman" issue here where the critics is stating one problem and the proponent is like "yeah but what if we change it to this". I'm guessing …
-
comment
Comment #31505347
then i would consider it working hours, so the premise here seems to reduce to how much overtime i'm willing to spend.
-
comment
Comment #31504121
I thought we're already over with the "every minute of your life is monetizable" mindset ?
-
comment
Comment #31429855
The chemical industry have has a much more lengthy history of bad chemicals: PFOA, asbestos, leaded gas, HCFCs... how can we be sure that plastic is not one of these ?
-
comment
Comment #31387354
Well yes but would you suppose they deregulate infant formula ?
-
comment
Comment #31190522
>The death toll will eventually be the same regardless. A quick Google show me Taiwan has 800 deaths so far. Massive 1M deaths does not seems very "inevitable" to me.
-
comment
Comment #31190442
Then it's just a regular network, hence why permissioned / private blockchains are a lies to crypto enthusiasts
-
comment
Comment #31190407
Proof of Work is only as good as the assumption that CPU power and energy are guaranteed to be equally distributed, also everyone must have equal access on the network. Which we've…
-
comment
Comment #31190380
In the sense that it is useless for society, by extracting the collective's wealth while providing no net benefits.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #31169407
You're very likely right and I made a mistake. In strict legal terms anything you do can be sued if the law deems it damaging it some way or another, and the answer to this->parent…