Viewing profile — hanspeter

Zuckerberg has spent billions trying to keep Meta's models relevant, somewhat unsuccessfully. If only he had known he could simply use his laptop to train them.

Well, if that is how you manage other hazards in the home, then yes. I would recommend another approach though. We decided for making changes to our home to allow our toddler to be…

While I agree we'll see millions of bipedal robots, it won't be because they're doing our chores. People will buy them for the same reason I'd want one today: They're fun toys. It'…

That's not a robot problem, that's a toddler problem. We don't leave our young toddlers to roam freely around the house for a reason. Our homes are full of hazards to these risk-se…

It most certainly isn't astrology that was on Google's mind when they decided for Gemini.

> 100k deaths in Europe that can be prevented if they lifted restrictions on AC Please don’t repeat this anti-Europe myth. Anyone applying a bit of common sense should realize how …

It has always been like this. Plan before you code. Now your plan is just in a prompt.

Calling this a "Protip" is generous. That the combined element has any surface area that doesn't toggle the radio setting is a straight-up bug. It is laughable for a component this…

Their point may be about viewing distance. If the edges of the screen are further from your eyes than the center, the content and text doesn't appear at the same size. If you wear …

This is an interesting claim. How many is plenty and what are the sources to back this?

It's basically a failure of setting up the proper response playbook. Instead of: 1. AI detects gun on surveillance 2. Dispatch armed police to location It should be: 1. AI detects …

What's the point of saving money if it's a risk to reputation?

I'm not new to simonw. It doesn't change that this is just a quote from a reddit post and a link to it.

Is there more to it, or are we calling the situation out of control based on a single anecdote from Reddit?

With per-per-minute sharing cars having existed in many cities in Europe 10+ years, this concept is not new. People will adapt to the level of cleanliness in the car the get into, …

The initial "Share" click doesn't post anything publicly. It just opens a modal so you can choose to post. You have to make a second click to confirm.

Users are playing around with AIs for entertainment all the time. You wouldn't be able to determine if seemingly private information was real or made up.

Share buttons offer no inherent privacy settings. Sharing to a text message is private. In contrast, sharing to social media platforms such as Twitter, Reddit, Pinterest, and Linke…

People share AI chats all the time on Twitter, Reddit, etc. I don't personally think the feature makes a lot of sense in Meta AI. However it's a lot more likely their product team …

I don't think this is a dark-pattern problem in the sense that I don't think it is _intentionally_ deceiving. I think Meta fully expected this feature to be used by people who are …

> > Provide full transparency about how many users have unknowingly shared private information. > Meta shouldn't have to do this And couldn't either. How would they know if users s…

It's not only hypocritical, it's nonsensical in this discussion. It's obvious that if advertising was made illegal, we would need to pay for all those services that we want to use.…

How would that be easier to come by? Who would maintain such information repositories and what would the incentive be to take that on? (As they no longer could be supported by ad r…

It's interesting that you leave out Google (and similar search engines). We would lose one of the most useful tools introduced to mankind in the last 3 decades.

Could you explain how you arrived at the $3.50/month figure? The model I understand you're suggesting is individual pricing based on usage and value as an ad target. A lot more com…