Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — handsomeransoms

handsomeransoms

HN member
Joined
Sun, Nov 07, 2010, 10:20 PM UTC
HN karma
519
Public activity
96 items

About handsomeransoms

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #9166273

    Whether or not this is acceptable depends on your threat model. If you believe your adversary might compromise or coerce the service operator, then you cannot trust in-browser encr…

  3. comment
    Comment #9050284

    This is very similar to the functionality provided by tlsdate ( https://github.com/ioerror/tlsdate ). They appear to have eschewed tlsdate's default approach of using the timestamp…

  4. comment
    Comment #9025293

    Are you generating the User ID with the additional characters and expecting the user to remember/keep track of it? I do think that is very user-friendly, even with the cookie trick…

  5. comment
    Comment #8960411

    Part of the problem of running an exit node is that it's unclear how "safe" it actually is, and as a result there is a lot of rumor and paranoia. Every country has different laws t…

  6. comment
    Comment #8949340

    Clicked "Look: Try our latest demo version" and got a certificate error in Chrome :(

  7. comment
    Comment #8949332

    minilock ( https://minilock.io/ ) intends to fill that exact niche. Have you tried it?

  8. comment
    Comment #8924827

    FYI Google Chrome warns that imagebin.com "might contain malware".

  9. comment
    Comment #8918729

    I think the title of this post is misleading. For context, see the summary of the amendment on p. 324, under "ACTION ITEM—Rule 41 (venue for approval of warrant for certain remote …

  10. comment
    Comment #8907905

    Another (incorrect, but hilariously so) interpretation of the output of traceroute: http://youtu.be/SXmv8quf_xM

  11. comment
    Comment #8889651

    Been using this for a minute, it's quite nice! Kudos to Nadim & team for a friendly and mostly intuitive UI, with some creative new ideas in the context of email/messaging. A few i…

  12. comment
    Comment #8827946

    > With email, you're right that POP/IMAP on a dedicated box is preferable from a security standpoint. This depends on your threat model, and I'd argue that this statement is untrue…

  13. comment
    Comment #8827354

    Freedom of the Press Foundation https://freedom.press -- DevOps Engineer Full-time, Bay Area local preferred but remote possible for exceptional candidates. We develop SecureDrop, …

  14. comment
    Comment #8696060

    I think it's theoretically possible to use Service Workers to do this, giving you a TOFU trust guarantee, although I think there are some issues due to the spec-mandated auto-updat…

  15. comment
    Comment #8627271

    > And Firefox's certificate API is not much better, only passive access without ability to block connections if you detect an unwanted cert. Nope. Firefox's Addon API lets you do p…

  16. comment
    Comment #8627246

    How many people are careful to type "https" every time they visit a website? How many people pay close attention to the lock icon/color of the URL bar? This advice seems to ignore …

  17. comment
    Comment #8627218

    This is the problem that pinning is intended to solve.

  18. comment
    Comment #8627189

    That's a common problem when using OTR with the same account in a multi-device environment. It is fixed by the introduction of instance tags in libotr 4.x [0]. You should check the…

  19. comment
    Comment #8499903

    This reminds me of the recent (~2 months ago) addition of a new, very fast Tor relay (faster than any other relay at the time) that only relayed Bitcoin traffice [0]. Wonder if tha…

  20. comment
    Comment #8487684

    You don't have to pick one or the other. According to the FAQ [0] (linked from the blog post): "In general, you’ll still be able to use a verification code the way you normally do …

  21. comment
    Comment #8454432

    See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008706

  22. comment
    Comment #8450805

    Great point, just a nit: Rust does not have mandatory GC.

  23. story
  24. comment
    Comment #8341267

    > You are implying something fundamental: that the encrypted traffic could be adequately analysed for insight without the need for decryption. > Yet to do so would be to defeat SSL…

  25. comment
    Comment #8330514

    Yeah, I'm having a hard time finding details on the vulnerabilities. A lot of the links in the advisories are broken, and the descriptions on the Mitre CVE pages seem to be awaitin…