Viewing profile — haldujai
haldujai
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 05, 2013, 1:16 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,927
- Public activity
- 873 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About haldujai
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49203610
It is very suspicious when they’re paying for GB300 more than they turn around and charge those out as a4x instances, it was announced a week before IPO and they have a 90 day exit…
-
comment
Comment #49192899
Backlog meaning RPO over 5 years. It’s not as if they would be able to collect 250B today from OpenAI and Anthropic if they were to have that compute. In any case, my point is that…
-
comment
Comment #49187890
A deal with a company Google has a share of, announced a week before their IPO, with very non-committal terms and ramp period protections delivered in one large block on short term…
-
comment
Comment #49162927
It hasn’t bent already? 2022-2024 certainly seemed far more exponential than 2024 to present.
-
comment
Comment #49050010
No, that’s not my argument. Rather it is that a counterexample to a mathematical proof whether produced by human or AI may be a scientific discovery but it is not inherently new an…
-
comment
Comment #49048505
The comment more likely means the harness source was read, not memory from a previous run and the first few turns of bp35 appear to be a cold start. Sure none of this is certain wi…
-
comment
Comment #49048244
If you are referring to the Jacobian conjecture Claude only provided a counterexample, not a disproof, neither of which is necessarily a “new brilliant scientific idea”.
-
comment
Comment #49045863
No but the session traces are available. It passes the sniff test considering how AGI-3 is scored and how this wrapper works. For example on bp35 it took fable 290M and >12k simula…
-
comment
Comment #49045375
For frontier models, not local. https://schema-harness.github.io/
-
comment
Comment #49045332
> Say, Claude 7 creates a new, brilliant scientific idea every 1 out of 1000 times. I would not hand wave that away - but Claude 5 feels closer to Claude 1 than the hypothetical Cl…
-
comment
Comment #49010466
Agreed. Berkeley / CXRO is the American beyond-NA research center not Albany NanoTech which doesn’t have a charter AFAIK. They are just beginning to install the EXE:5200 in Albany …
-
comment
Comment #48726911
Claude, the model in the post.
-
comment
Comment #48714554
Radiologist who does read shoulder MRI would like to add that over half the annotations are wrong, glaring mistakes in anatomy and cardinal direction which begs the question of how…
-
comment
Comment #48694532
Ultrasound is very operator dependent. Shoulder ultrasound is very hard. Visualizing the labrum let alone detecting pathology is very very hard and you will miss huge chunks of it …
-
comment
Comment #48694501
Half baked images? No one said that is impossible. I am skeptical of any brain ultrasound claim that doesn’t use skull correction which requires a CT scan. Very large chunks of vas…
-
comment
Comment #48694486
Depends for what reason. I trained in Canada. Studies are triaged priority 1 through 4 in most provinces. Nowhere in Canada is a high priority MRI waiting 2 months.
-
comment
Comment #48694479
They are mistaken. I am a practicing radiologist in the US. We regularly work-up findings from private pay whole body screening MRIs and the workups are covered by insurance.
-
comment
Comment #48634026
It’s called evidence based medicine for a reason. Medicine has long since moved away from making decisions based on whether a person thinks it will be better. > Ultimately, it shou…
-
comment
Comment #48610282
1. Having concerns over unvetted AI is not the same thing as running an exclusive protectionist racket. 2. Doctors who depend on revenue from forced visits to renew prescriptions a…
-
comment
Comment #48606602
> technically I don't need the doctor That’s the goal for doctors too. It would be great to get simple things off the system. But I think the more realistic intermediate step is a …
-
comment
Comment #48605866
My gut as a physician says AI will revolutionize primary care the most and the premise of AI having more specialized knowledge than a PCP holds water - I think the future of primar…
-
comment
Comment #48589365
Probably cheaper and substantially better contrast resolution to use low field strength perma magnet MRIs with advanced computation to be honest.
-
comment
Comment #48589348
> The brain is encased in bone, so you might get some penetration but it will be very limited. Radiologist as well. Remember this is full wave inversion not pulsed wave B mode. You…
-
comment
Comment #48581183
This is ridiculously optimistic. The technology, USCT with full waveform inversion, is not new. It’s already used in breast imaging (SoftVue) and hasn’t replace mammography. A body…
-
comment
Comment #48581065
There is some evidence for hormesis - but yes no model is proven right now. LNT is the most conservative model and part of why it sticks around. A good primer: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm…